RetFit: A Novel Deep Learning Biomarker Based on Cardiorespiratory Fitness Derived From the Retina
Quintas, I.; Bontempi, D.; Bors, S.; Trofimova, O.; Boettger, L.; Iuliani, I.; Ortin Vela, S.; Bergmann, S.; Presby, D. M.
Show abstract
Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality, often outperforming traditional risk factors. However, its clinical assessment remains limited due to the need for specialized equipment, personnel, and time demands. Because CRF is closely tied to vascular health, surrogate measures that capture vascular features may provide a practical alternative for its estimation. Retinal Color Fundus Images (CFIs) provide a non-invasive window into systemic vascular health and have already proven useful in predicting cardiovascular risk factors and diseases. However, CFIs have yet to be explored for their potential to predict CRF. In this study, we introduce RetFit, a novel CRF estimator derived from CFIs by leveraging state-of-the-art vision transformers. We evaluated RetFits clinical relevance by analyzing its associations with cardiovascular risk factors and disease outcomes, and exploring its genetic architecture, benchmarking it against a submaximal-exercise-test CRF (SETCRF) estimate. RetFit was prognostic of both cardiovascular events (hazard ratios as low as 0.668, 95%CI 0.617-0.723, p<0.001) and overall mortality (hazard ratios as low as 0.780, 95%CI 0.754-0.801, p<0.001), and significantly associated with the majority of disease states and risk factors explored, with these effects being consistent across two external and independent cohorts. Although RetFit and SETCRF shared a moderate phenotypic correlation (r=0.45), their significant genetic associations were disjoint. Interpretability analyses suggest a role for retinal vasculature in RetFits predictions, with attention maps emphasizing vascular regions and segmentation analyses showing arterial bifurcation count as the strongest associated feature ({beta}=0.287, 95% CI 0.263-0.311, p<0.001). These findings highlight the potential of retinal imaging as a scalable, cost-effective, and accessible alternative for CRF estimation, supporting its use in large-scale screening and risk stratification in both clinical and public health contexts.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Capturing additional genetic risk from family history for improved polygenic risk prediction 94%
- Composite trait Mendelian Randomization reveals distinct metabolic and lifestyle consequences of differences in body shape 94%
- Identification of genetic factors influencing metabolic dysregulation and retinal support for MacTel, a retinal disorder 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic subgroups and cardiometabolic multimorbidity in the UK Biobank 95%
- Ox-LDL induces a non-inflammatory response enriched for coronary artery disease risk in human endothelial cells 94%
- Synteny: a high throughput web tool to streamline causal gene prioritisation and provide insight into protein function 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Estimating body fat distribution – a driver of cardiometabolic health – from silhouette images 94%
- Cohort Design and Natural Language Processing to Reduce Bias in Electronic Health Records Research: The Community Care Cohort Project 93%
- Accelerometer-Derived and Genetically Inferred Physical Activity and Human Disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- GWAS of Retinal Vessel Tortuosity Identifies 173 Novel Loci Revealing Genes and Pathways Associated with Vascular Pathomechanics and Cardiometabolic Diseases 94%
- Quantification of Fundus Autofluorescence Features in a Molecularly Characterized Cohort of More Than 3500 Inherited Retinal Disease Patients from the United Kingdom 90%
- Comparative analysis of single-cell and single-nucleus RNA-sequencing in a rabbit model of retinal detachment-related proliferative vitreoretinopathy. 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.