Back

Promoting physical activity in glioma patients: insights from Dutch healthcare professionals

Blom, M. E. C.; Gorter, M.; de Witt Hamer, P. C.; Niers, J. M.; Jelsma, J. G. M.; Klein, M.; Douw, L.

2025-09-30 neurology
10.1101/2025.09.29.25336660 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundAlthough physical activity may play a significant role in enhancing quality of life for glioma patients, its integration into clinical care remains underexplored. This study assessed the experiences, perspectives, and barriers of healthcare professionals in promoting physical activity for glioma patients. MethodsAn online survey with 19 questions was distributed to Dutch healthcare professionals registered with the Dutch Neuro-Oncology Society (LWNO). Additionally, professionals were individually asked to remind and invite their colleagues to participate. Participants provided informed consent. ResultsFifty-five professionals from 20 centers completed the survey, mainly neurologists (35%) and nurses (33%). Most professionals (58%) indicated receiving frequent questions about physical activity, particularly regarding safety and appropriate activities. Additionally, 76% stated they often proactively provide advice, typically recommending low-intensity activities like walking. Key barriers to making such recommendations included limited information materials (37%), knowledge (33%), and referral options (27%). Professionals concerns about physical activity included risks of overexertion and patient discouragement if activity would prove too challenging. Despite these challenges, 89% supported integrating physical activity into glioma care, and 56% expressed a need for specific guidelines. While professionals believe in the benefits for symptom management and quality of life, 62% were neutral about the strength of supporting evidence. ConclusionsPhysical activity is frequently discussed in glioma care, but recommendations are mostly inappropriate due to limited knowledge, resources, and guidance. Existing guidelines are rarely applied in practice. Future research should accumulate evidence, develop tailored guidelines, and equip professionals with tools to truly integrate physical activity into practice. Key pointsO_LIPhysical activity is discussed in glioma care, but recommendations are challenging C_LIO_LIBarriers included limited informational materials, knowledge and referral options C_LIO_LIThere is strong support for integrating physical activity C_LI Importance of the studyQuality of life is a major concern for glioma patients, and physical activity has emerged as a promising complementary intervention to alleviate symptoms and enhance quality of life through its positive effects on physical and mental well-being. Although healthcare professionals recognize its value and frequently discuss physical activity with patients, significant barriers persist, including limited informational materials, insufficient knowledge, and uncertainty about referral options. While the benefits of physical activity are well-established in other types of cancer with cancer-specific guidelines, such guidelines and physical activity recommendations are not implemented in glioma care. Given the lack of glioma-specific evidence on the effects of physical activity, it remains unclear whether additional guidelines should be developed at all. This study identifies both the practical challenges and the evidence gap, highlighting the urgent need for targeted research, better resources, and structured support to help professionals effectively guide glioma patients in their physical activities.

Published in Neuro-Oncology Practice · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
BMC Cancer
52 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 16%
10.8%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.0%
4
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
5
Neuro-Oncology Advances
24 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.1%
6
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.8%
7
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.8%
8
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
9
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
10
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
50% of probability mass above
11
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
12
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
13
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.5%
14
Neuro-Oncology
30 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
15
Systematic Reviews
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
16
BMC Neurology
12 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.5%
17
Journal of the Neurological Sciences
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
18
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.4%
19
Health Expectations
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.3%
20
Cancer Medicine
24 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.3%
21
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
22
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
23
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.0%
24
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
28 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
Palliative Medicine
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
27
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
28
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 72%
0.8%
29
European Journal of Cancer
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
30
Journal of Public Health
23 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%