Promoting physical activity in glioma patients: insights from Dutch healthcare professionals
Blom, M. E. C.; Gorter, M.; de Witt Hamer, P. C.; Niers, J. M.; Jelsma, J. G. M.; Klein, M.; Douw, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundAlthough physical activity may play a significant role in enhancing quality of life for glioma patients, its integration into clinical care remains underexplored. This study assessed the experiences, perspectives, and barriers of healthcare professionals in promoting physical activity for glioma patients. MethodsAn online survey with 19 questions was distributed to Dutch healthcare professionals registered with the Dutch Neuro-Oncology Society (LWNO). Additionally, professionals were individually asked to remind and invite their colleagues to participate. Participants provided informed consent. ResultsFifty-five professionals from 20 centers completed the survey, mainly neurologists (35%) and nurses (33%). Most professionals (58%) indicated receiving frequent questions about physical activity, particularly regarding safety and appropriate activities. Additionally, 76% stated they often proactively provide advice, typically recommending low-intensity activities like walking. Key barriers to making such recommendations included limited information materials (37%), knowledge (33%), and referral options (27%). Professionals concerns about physical activity included risks of overexertion and patient discouragement if activity would prove too challenging. Despite these challenges, 89% supported integrating physical activity into glioma care, and 56% expressed a need for specific guidelines. While professionals believe in the benefits for symptom management and quality of life, 62% were neutral about the strength of supporting evidence. ConclusionsPhysical activity is frequently discussed in glioma care, but recommendations are mostly inappropriate due to limited knowledge, resources, and guidance. Existing guidelines are rarely applied in practice. Future research should accumulate evidence, develop tailored guidelines, and equip professionals with tools to truly integrate physical activity into practice. Key pointsO_LIPhysical activity is discussed in glioma care, but recommendations are challenging C_LIO_LIBarriers included limited informational materials, knowledge and referral options C_LIO_LIThere is strong support for integrating physical activity C_LI Importance of the studyQuality of life is a major concern for glioma patients, and physical activity has emerged as a promising complementary intervention to alleviate symptoms and enhance quality of life through its positive effects on physical and mental well-being. Although healthcare professionals recognize its value and frequently discuss physical activity with patients, significant barriers persist, including limited informational materials, insufficient knowledge, and uncertainty about referral options. While the benefits of physical activity are well-established in other types of cancer with cancer-specific guidelines, such guidelines and physical activity recommendations are not implemented in glioma care. Given the lack of glioma-specific evidence on the effects of physical activity, it remains unclear whether additional guidelines should be developed at all. This study identifies both the practical challenges and the evidence gap, highlighting the urgent need for targeted research, better resources, and structured support to help professionals effectively guide glioma patients in their physical activities.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility of individualized home exercise programs for patients with head and neck cancer – study protocol and first results of a multicentre single-arm intervention trial (OSHO #94) 93%
- Do people with disabilities experience disparities in cancer care? A systematic review 92%
- The Role of Prehabilitation in Improving Brain Health and Cognition After Chemotherapy in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: Study Protocol of the Chemo Brain Prehab Project 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Assessing awareness of blood cancer symptoms and barriers to symptomatic presentation: Measure development and results from a population survey in the UK 90%
- Landscape of Clinical Trials in Cancer Cachexia: Assessment of Trends From 1995-2024 90%
- A Large Scale Multi-dataset Investigation of Brain Metastases Distribution Based on Primary Cancer Type 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Barriers and facilitators to implementing core osteoarthritis treatments in China: a mixed-method study 91%
- Correlates of and changes in aerobic physical activity and strength training before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic in the UK – findings from the HEBECO study 91%
- Long Covid and the role of physical activity: a qualitative study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cancer risk algorithms in primary care: can they improve risk estimates and referral decisions? 90%
- Systematic Review of Large Language Models for Patient Care: Current Applications and Challenges 89%
- The prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infection and other public health outcomes during the BA.2/BA.2.12.1 surge, New York City, April-May 2022 86%
Similar papers in this journal
- Can Large Language Models Aid Caregivers of Pediatric Cancer Patients in Information Seeking? A Cross-Sectional Investigation 91%
- A Video Intervention to Improve Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing in Patients with Cancer 89%
- Peripheral blood mononuclear cells exhibit increased mitochondrial respiration after adjuvant chemo- and radiotherapy for early breast cancer 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.