Back

A targeted amplicon sequencing panel for cost-effective high-throughput genotyping of Aedes aegypti

Daron, J.; Lecuyer, A.; Ma, L.; Marzooghi, P.; Breban, M. I.; Kryrylos, P.; Donovan-Banfield, I.; Redmond, S. N.; LAMBRECHTS, L.

2025-09-30 genomics
10.1101/2025.09.28.679043 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The mosquito Aedes aegypti is the primary vector for several medically significant arboviruses, including dengue, Zika, chikungunya, and yellow fever. Studying the genetic diversity of Ae. aegypti is crucial for understanding its evolutionary history, population dynamics, and the effectiveness of vector control methods. Due to the large genome size of Ae. aegypti, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is often cost-prohibitive for large-scale studies. Recent advances in reduced-representation methods, aiming to reduce costs by sequencing only a small portion of the genome, provide cost-effective alternatives. However, a standardized set of genome-wide markers specifically designed for population genetic studies of Ae. aegypti remains unavailable. Here, we present a targeted amplicon sequencing panel designed for cost-effective, high-throughput genotyping across 291 loci distributed throughout the Ae. aegypti genome. Our in silico analyses indicate that this amplicon panel effectively replicates population structure analyses typically derived from WGS data. We demonstrate that the amplicon panel accurately discriminates between diverse laboratory colonies of Ae. aegypti and consistently measures individual genetic admixture to a degree comparable with WGS. By enabling high-throughput genotyping at a reduced cost, we anticipate that our targeted amplicon sequencing panel will facilitate large-scale genotyping studies of Ae. aegypti for vector surveillance and population structure analyses, especially in resource-limited settings.

Published in Parasites & Vectors · training set

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.