Back

Periplasmic production of Green Fluorescent Protein is poorly tolerated by Escherichia coli

Osgerby, A.; Overton, T. W.

2025-09-29 bioengineering
10.1101/2025.09.28.679025 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Escherichia coli is a commonly used host for recombinant protein production. It is advantageous to direct many recombinant proteins, especially those that require disulphide bonding for function, such as antibody fragments, to the periplasm of E. coli. This requires N-terminal fusion of a signal peptide that directs the polypeptide chain through the relevant translocation apparatus. Signal peptides cannot be selected on the basis of recombinant gene sequence, so screening is required to select the optimal signal peptide for each product, typically using subcellular fractionation, a time-intensive process. Fusion of a fluorescent protein such as GFP to the C-terminal of recombinant proteins has previously been used to accelerate cytoplasmic protein production process development, but most GFP proteins are not active in the periplasm. Previous studies have developed GFP derivatives that fold rapidly (such as superfolder GFP, sfGFP) and have been reported to be periplasmically active. Here, we tested the applicability of sfGFP as a periplasmic screening tool using single-cell analysis and structured illumination microscopy. We discovered that sfGFP is very poorly tolerated in the periplasm, causing deleterious effects on E. coli physiology, manifesting as poor growth, cell death, and loss of recombinant protein productivity. A further reason for poor GFP functionality in the periplasm is errant disulphide bonding, so we tested a cysteine-free GFP, which cannot form disulphide bonds; results were similar to sfGFP. In conclusion, currently-available GFP variants are poor fusion partners for screening production and translocation of recombinant proteins to the E. coli periplasm due to their negative impact on physiology. HighlightsO_LIGFP is a useful screening tool recombinant protein production. C_LIO_LIWe tested periplasmic expression of GFP derivatives sfGFP and cfSGFP2. C_LIO_LIWe used structured illumination microscopy to visualise GFP accumulation. C_LIO_LIPeriplasmic GFP derivatives have significant negative effects on bacterial physiology C_LI

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.5%
2
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.1%
3
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.8%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.9%
5
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.9%
6
Applied and Environmental Microbiology
301 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Biology Open
130 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.6%
8
ACS Synthetic Biology
256 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
9
BMC Biotechnology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
10
Microbial Cell Factories
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
13
Insects
36 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.3%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
15
Algal Research
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
16
Journal of Microbiological Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
17
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
18
Microbiology
57 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.9%
19
Metabolic Engineering Communications
20 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
20
Journal of Open Source Software
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
21
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
23
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics
222 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.7%
25
mSphere
281 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
26
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
27
Methods
29 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
28
Journal of Neuroscience Methods
106 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Protein Science
221 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.6%