Adaptive Dynamics of Quantitative Traits in a SteadilyChanging Environment
Pahujani, S.; Zhang, Y.; Stetter, M. G.; Krug, J.
Show abstract
Understanding the adaptation of quantitative traits to changing environments is a central challenge in evolutionary biology. However, the precise roles of the speed of environmental change and trait architecture in adaptive dynamics remain unclear. Here, we investigate their roles through an adaptive walk model and individual-based polygenic simulations within a moving-soptimum framework. We introduce a dimensionless parameter, the effective selection strength, to characterize quantitative traits in both models. We show that adapting populations attain a stationary state below a critical speed of environmental change. Properties of the stationary state are compared between the two approaches, and it is shown that the adaptive walk model provides a good approximation for long-term polygenic adaptation. Additionally, in the adaptive walk model, we derive an explicit formula for the logarithmic divergence of the stationary phenotypic gap upon approaching the critical speed. To elucidate population extinction in biologically realistic terms, we define a fitness-threshold-based critical speed and reveal its power-law dependence on the effective selection strength in both models. Finally, results of our polygenic simulations show how the genetic architecture in the stationary regime is shaped by a dynamic equilibrium between the influx of de novo mutations and their loss through fixation and extinction constrained by the rate of phenotypic change enforced by the optimum speed. Taken together, our study advances the understanding of polygenic adaptation and provides insights to simplify analytical work and computational simulations for future studies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.