Back

Evaluation of LiDAR-based Canopy Trait Estimation in Midwestern Row Crops

Siebers, M. H.; Fu, P.; Long, S. P.; McGrath, J. M.; Bernacchi, C. J.

2025-09-30 plant biology
10.1101/2025.09.28.678542 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Stand count, the number of plants per unit ground area, and leaf area index (LAI), the ratio of leaf area to ground area, are critical traits for crop research but are traditionally measured using labor-intensive methods. While new sensing technologies are being developed, quantifying improvement in measurement efficiency and data quality, relative to traditional techniques, is lacking. In this study, we use LiDAR to generate 3D scans of corn and soybean plots and evaluate two computational methods: a gap fraction approach to estimate LAI and a persistent homology algorithm to estimate stand count by detecting structural peaks in the canopy. Validation experiments and statistical comparisons of bias and variance demonstrate that LiDAR-derived LAI estimates in corn are comparable in quality to those from established instruments. However, in soybean, the LiDAR method performs poorly, likely due to dense canopies limiting light penetration and structural differentiation. Stand count estimations in corn closely match manual counts, with the added benefit of full-plot coverage and significantly faster data collection. In soybean, stand count estimates are unreliable under dense canopy conditions. These results offer practical guidance for the use of LiDAR in field phenotyping and highlight both its current capabilities and limitations. While a trade-off between speed and precision remains, particularly in high-density canopies, LiDARs scalability and multi-trait potential make it a promising tool for high-throughput breeding programs. Continued improvements in LiDAR hardware and algorithm design may further enhance measurement accuracy and extend applicability across crops and growth stages.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.2%
3
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.4%
4
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
5
Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.8%
6
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
4.1%
7
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.9%
8
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.6%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 38%
3.5%
10
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
160 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.4%
11
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
13
Crop Science
18 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
14
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
15
Phytopathology®
28 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.6%
16
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
17
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 24%
0.8%
20
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
21
Journal of Visualized Experiments
30 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
22
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 66%
0.6%