Multimodal Imaging and Logistic Weighted Cognitive Scores for Classification of MCI, AD, and FTD Subtypes
Khokhar, S. K.; Misra, R.; Kumar, M.; Arshad, F.; Thanissery, N.; Kumar, S.; Manae, T.; Ramakrishnan, S.; Mangalore, S.; Alladi, S.; Gandhi, T. K.; Bharath, R. D.
Show abstract
BackgroundDifferentiating between mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimers disease (AD), and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) subtypes remains a clinical challenge due to overlapping cognitive symptoms, structural atrophy, and metabolic patterns, especially in the early stages. Multimodal classification approaches integrating neuroimaging and cognitive scores may offer early and accurate characterization and subsequently improved diagnostic precision. MethodsIn this study, we included 100 participants (50 AD, 30 FTD, including 14 bvFTD and 16 PPA, and 20 MCI) who underwent simultaneous structural MRI and FDG-PET imaging. Cortical thickness (CTH) from anatomical MRI and standardized uptake values from FDG-PET were extracted using FreeSurfer and PETSurfer pipelines, respectively. CTH and FDG-PET features were combined into a single vector through a logistic weighting function derived from ACE-III scores, capturing the progressive nature of cognitive decline in dementia. A Naive Bayes classifier was then trained to differentiate diagnostic groups based on the merged features. ResultsThe model achieved classification accuracies of 83% for MCI vs. dementia (AD + FTD), 85% for MCI vs. FTD, 87% for MCI vs. PPA, 71% for MCI vs. bvFTD, 64% for MCI vs. AD, and 69% for AD vs. FTD. The overall classification accuracy was 68%, with the highest discriminative performance observed in separating MCI from FTD subtypes. ConclusionsThis study presents a novel, cognition-weighted multimodal approach combining structural and metabolic imaging to enhance the classification of neurodegenerative syndromes. Findings from this study, underscore the potential of integrating ACE-III scores with neuroimaging biomarkers for accurate characterization and, early-stage differentiation of MCI, AD, and FTD variants.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating plasma, MRI, and cognitive biomarkers for personalized prediction of decline across cognitive domains 96%
- Transfer Learning for Predicting Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Dementia of Alzheimer Type based on 3D-Convolutional Neural Network 96%
- Nucleus basalis of Meynert degeneration signals earliest stage of Alzheimer's disease progression 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medial temporal atrophy in preclinical dementia: visual and automated assessment during six year follow-up 97%
- Preliminary Validation of a Structural Magnetic Resonance Imaging Metric for Tracking Dementia-Related Neurodegeneration and Future Decline 97%
- White matter hyperintensities and neuropsychiatric symptoms in Alzheimer’s disease and mild cognitive impairment 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Topographical overlapping of the Aβ and Tau pathologies in the Default mode networks predicts Alzheimer’s Disease with higher specificity 98%
- FMRI complexity correlates with tau-PET in Late-Onset and Autosomal Dominant Alzheimer's Disease 96%
- Predicting brain amyloid-β PET phenotypes with graph convolutional networks based on functional MRI and multi-level functional connectivity 96%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.