Noninvasive profiling of input-output excitability curves in human prefrontal cortex
Chen, N.-F.; Hassan, U.; Ross, J. M.; Forman, L.; Hartford, J. W.; Gogulski, J.; Parmigiani, S.; Truong, J.; Keller, C. J.; Cline, C. C.
Show abstract
Abstract.O_ST_ABSBackgroundC_ST_ABSThe prefrontal cortex plays a critical role in cognitive control and behavior, and its dysfunction has been linked to numerous psychiatric and neurological disorders. However, noninvasive measurement of prefrontal activity remains challenging, limiting our understanding of how to optimize prefrontal treatments. Input-output relationships reveal how neural circuits respond to different inputs and are essential for determining optimal treatment parameters and understanding individual variability in treatment response, yet systematic investigation of prefrontal input-output relationships has been lacking. ObjectiveTo characterize human prefrontal excitability with input-output (I/O) curves. MethodsWe employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) with electroencephalography in a randomized mixed-block design with 28 healthy participants receiving single-pulse TMS to left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) across 12 stimulation intensities (60-140% of resting motor threshold). We quantified prefrontal excitability using early local TMS-evoked potentials (EL-TEPs), cortical responses measured locally 20-60 ms post-stimulus. ResultsWe observed a strong effect of TMS intensity on prefrontal EL-TEP amplitudes. Sigmoidal EL-TEP I/O curves were observed in 57% of participants, with the sigmoidality partially explained by EL-TEP signal quality. Correlations were observed between EL-TEP and motor-evoked potential curve parameters, but intensity parameterization approaches did not significantly differ in explaining inter-individual EL-TEP response variability. Reliable EL-TEPs could be obtained using fewer TMS pulses at high intensities, and test- retest assessments revealed robust I/O curve profiles. ConclusionsThese findings provide a systematic noninvasive characterization of prefrontal input-output physiology, establishing a framework for estimating prefrontal excitability. The comparison of various intensity parameterizations motivates the need for enhanced models and individualized measurement of stimulation responses. HighlightsO_LIWe present noninvasive input-output curves for prefrontal TMS. C_LIO_LIEL-TEPs exhibit robust dose-dependent responses to TMS intensity. C_LIO_LISigmoidal I/O curves observed in 57% of participants, with a strong dependence on signal quality. C_LIO_LICorrelations observed between MEP and prefrontal EL-TEP curve parameters. C_LIO_LIHigh test-retest reliability and rapid protocols at [≥]110% rMT C_LI
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Double-Blind Replication Attempt of Offline 5Hz-rTUS-Induced Corticospinal Excitability 97%
- Extracting Reproducible Components from Electroencephalographic Responses to Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with Group Task-Related Component Analysis 96%
- Distinct and complementary mechanisms of oscillatory and aperiodic alpha activity in visuospatial attention 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Recognizing EEG responses to active TMS vs. sham stimulations in different TMS-EEG datasets: a machine learning approach 96%
- A Practical Preprocessing Pipeline for Concurrent TMS-iEEG: Critical Steps and Methodological Considerations 96%
- Efficient high-resolution TMS mapping of the human motor cortex by nonlinear regression 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimized Monophasic Pulses with Equivalent Electric Field for Rapid-Rate Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation 94%
- TAP: Targeting and analysis pipeline for optimization and verification of coil placement in transcranial magnetic stimulation 94%
- Probing the circuits of conscious perception with magnetophosphenes 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.