Cleavage of MEP-1 by DPF-3 Reveals Novel Substrate Specificity and Its Impact on Reproductive Fitness
Aygun, I.; Amanullah, A.; Seebacher, J.; Hess, D.; Soneson, C.; Grosshans, H.; Gudipati, R. K.
Show abstract
Proteases are enzymes that catalyse the hydrolysis of peptide bonds in proteins for their functional, modification or degradation. Members of the Dipeptidyl Peptidase IV (DPPIV) family are exopeptidases that cleave dipeptides off the N-termini of their substrate peptides, typically after proline or alanine. Recently, we showed that human DPP4 and Caenorhabditis elegans DPF-3 have a larger target repertoire in vitro, permitting cleavage after additional amino acids. Here, we use TAILS (Terminal Amine Isotopic Labelling of Substrates) to identify DPF-3 targets in vivo and observe cleavage of MEP-1 after threonine, confirming a broader substrate specificity of DPF-3 also in vivo. Demonstrating physiological relevance, we show that rendering MEP-1 resistant to cleavage disrupts its stability, leading to developmental abnormalities such as defective gonadal migration and reproductive issues. Collectively, our findings highlight a previously unappreciated complexity in the substrate specificity of DPPIV family proteases and suggest that their physiological roles may extend beyond what is currently known. IMPORTANTO_LIManuscripts submitted to Review Commons are peer reviewed in a journal-agnostic way. C_LIO_LIUpon transfer of the peer reviewed preprint to a journal, the referee reports will be available in full to the handling editor. C_LIO_LIThe identity of the referees will NOT be communicated to the authors unless the reviewers choose to sign their report. C_LIO_LIThe identity of the referee will be confidentially disclosed to any affiliate journals to which the manuscript is transferred. C_LI GUIDELINESO_LIFor reviewers: https://www.reviewcommons.org/reviewers C_LIO_LIFor authors: https://www.reviewcommons.org/authors C_LI CONTACTThe Review Commons office can be contacted directly at: office@reviewcommons.org
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cross-species analysis of LZTR1 loss-of-function mutants demonstrates dependency to RIT1 orthologs 96%
- Proximity labeling identifies LOTUS domain proteins that promote the formation of perinuclear germ granules in C. elegans 95%
- Drosophila nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunits and their native interactions with insecticidal peptide toxins 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- PI3P dependent regulation of cell size and autophagy by phosphatidylinositol 5-phosphate 4-kinase 95%
- Meiotic DNA breaks activate a streamlined phospho-signaling response that largely avoids protein level changes 95%
- CLN3 deficiency leads to neurological and metabolic perturbations during early development 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.