Back

Computational modeling of optogenetic control in human atrial tissue: The role of fibrosis type and illumination strategy

Zhan, H.; Liu, K.; Wei, C.; Deng, D.; Yu, Y.

2025-09-29 physiology
10.1101/2025.09.26.678713 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Atrial fibrosis promotes atrial fibrillation by stabilizing spiral waves, with focal fibrosis causing strong anchoring that resists termination. Optogenetics offers a low-energy alternative for rhythm control, but its efficacy in human atrial tissue remains under investigation. Here, we developed a two-dimensional computational model of human atrial tissue expressing the light-sensitive protein GtACR1, coupled with fibroblasts, to simulate spiral wave dynamics under varying degrees (0%-100%) and types (focal vs. diffuse) of fibrosis. We examined the effects of subthreshold illumination area (0%-100%) and spatial intensity profiles (uniform, parabolic, linear, exponential) on termination efficiency, and tested low-intensity periodic stimulation for wave drift induction. Results show that the minimum light area required for termination increases with fibrosis degree. At 25%-50% fibrosis, focal substrates require larger illumination areas than diffuse ones, confirming stronger anchoring. Crucially, the relationship between illumination area and termination time is non-monotonic. An "optimal light range" exists: smaller areas fail to eliminate the wave, while excessively large areas suppress wavefront collisions, prolonging termination. In diffuse fibrosis, low-intensity periodic illumination successfully induces drift and boundary collision, enabling self-termination. In contrast, in focal fibrosis, the spiral wave core remains anchored, and drift cannot be initiated by modulating stimulation frequency or intensity alone. Our findings demonstrate that fibrosis type and extent critically influence optogenetic control efficacy. The existence of an optimal illumination strategy highlights the need for spatially tailored interventions. These results provide a mechanistic basis for developing individualized, low-energy optogenetic defibrillation protocols. Author summaryAtrial fibrillation, a common heart rhythm disorder, is often sustained by rotating electrical waves in the heart muscle. Scarring (fibrosis) in the atria can anchor these waves, making them harder to eliminate. Optogenetics -- a technique that uses light to control genetically modified heart cells--offers a promising low-energy approach to stop these dangerous rhythms. However, how different patterns of scarring affect the success of optical interventions remains unclear. In this study, we developed a computational model of human atrial tissue expressing a light-sensitive protein (GtACR1) to investigate how two major types of fibrosis--localized "focal" scars versus widespread "diffuse" scarring -- influence the effectiveness of light-based rhythm control. We found that focal fibrosis strongly anchors spiral waves, requiring larger illuminated areas for termination, while diffuse fibrosis allows more efficient disruption with smaller light zones. Crucially, we discovered an "optimal light range": too little light fails to stop the wave, but too much can paradoxically prolong termination by suppressing wavefront collisions. Furthermore, we show that low-intensity periodic light can induce drift and self-termination in diffuse fibrotic tissue, but fails in focal substrates due to structural anchoring. Our findings highlight that one-size-fits-all optical strategies are suboptimal, and that personalized illumination protocols--tailored to individual fibrosis patterns--could enable safer, lower-energy defibrillation in the future.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
26.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.3%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 11%
7.0%
4
Biophysical Journal
545 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
6.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 34%
4.4%
6
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 19%
3.8%
7
Brain Stimulation
112 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
3.7%
8
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.7%
9
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.1%
10
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 12%
2.8%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 45%
2.7%
12
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
189 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.4%
13
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.9%
14
Journal of Experimental Biology
249 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.8%
15
Journal of General Physiology
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.4%
16
The Journal of Physiology
134 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.3%
17
American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
32 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.3%
18
Journal of Neural Engineering
197 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
19
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
88 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.7%
21
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 22%
0.7%
22
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 31%
0.5%
23
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.5%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%
25
Cells
232 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%