Robustness and fidelity of voltage imaging analysis pipelines
Silva, R.; Bartalis-Szelyes, H.; Brinks, D.; Gao, Z.
Show abstract
Tracking neuronal voltage changes using fluorescent voltage indicators is rapidly reshaping neuroscientific research. Voltage imaging enables direct visualization of electrical signals from subcellular compartments to large-scale networks, yet requires sophisticated image-analysis procedures. Here, we present a comprehensive study of current voltage imaging analysis pipelines and discuss the experimental conditions for which they are most suitable. We compare strengths and limitations of these pipelines in motion correction, denoising and segmentation routines, and discuss how different signal processing strategies can influence data integrity and interpretation. Our results show that most real-time analyses require GPU-accelerated algorithms and that denoising prior to signal processing is needed for analysis of subcellular dynamics. We conclude that voltage imaging analyses needs to be tailored to different experimental settings: we propose a decision-tree to determine analysis strategies for diverse experimental conditions. Together, these insights pave the way for reproducible, high-fidelity voltage imaging studies.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mesmerize: a dynamically adaptable user-friendly analysis platform for 2D & 3D calcium imaging data. 95%
- Highly adaptable deep-learning platform for automated detection and analysis of vesicle exocytosis 94%
- Versatile live-cell activity analysis platform for characterization of neuronal dynamics at single-cell and network level 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional ultrasound imaging and neuronal activity: how accurate is the spatiotemporal match? 95%
- A supervised data-driven spatial filter denoising method for speech artifacts in intracranial electrophysiological recordings 93%
- Mapping axon diameters and conduction velocity in the rat brain - different methods tell different stories of the structure-function relationship 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.