Spatial and Single-cell Transcriptomics Reveal Programs Governing Fibroblastic Foci Fibroblasts
Stein, Y.; Freund, O.; Borsekofsky, S.; Cohn-Schwartz, D.; Levy, L.; Ofek, E.; Spitzer, A.; Adams, T. S.; Schupp, J. C.; Kaminski, N.; Bar-Shai, A.; Unterman, A.
Show abstract
RationaleFibroblastic foci (FF) are central for fibrosis propagation in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), yet their resident fibroblast subpopulation remains poorly defined. ObjectiveTo deeply characterize FF-fibroblasts and identify programs governing their differentiation and activation. MethodsGeoMx spatial transcriptomics was applied to IPF lung regions, comparing carefully delineated FF (excluding overlying epithelium) with areas of established fibrosis, to derive an FF-specific signature. This signature was projected onto a large single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) dataset to identify an FF-specific fibroblast cluster, facilitating its deep characterization. Measurements and Main ResultsGeoMx revealed 272 increased genes in FF; this FF-signature was validated against several independent spatial transcriptomics and proteomics datasets. FF-signature genes were highly enriched in a specific cluster of fibroblasts in the IPF scRNA-seq dataset. MMP11 was the most specific gene of the FF-fibroblast cluster, and was validated using in situ RNA hybridization. Furthermore, higher MMP11 bronchoalveolar lavage protein levels were found in progressive pulmonary fibrosis and were associated with worse outcome in Cox regression (HR 4.54, 95% CI 1.24-15.8). Cell-cell interaction analysis with fibroblasts and adjacent aberrant basaloid cells, detected signals that may induce the FF-fibroblast signature, including from TGF-{beta} superfamily ligands. Using trajectory and transcription factor (TF) analysis we show that the trajectory from non-FF to FF-specific fibroblasts is correlated with activation of EMT-associated TFs and deactivation of AP-1 family TFs. ConclusionsWe identified transcriptional programs governing FF-fibroblasts, for which MMP11 serves as a novel highly-specific biomarker with prognostic significance. We highlight potential regulators whose targeting may curb pulmonary fibrosis progression.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Hematopoietic and Lung Platelet Biogenesis as a Prognostic Indicator in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF) 94%
- Spatial transcriptomics uncovers hybrid, pro-inflammatory and pro-fibrotic cellular niches in pulmonary granuloma of patients with chronic sarcoidosis 94%
- Single-Cell Imaging Maps Inflammatory Cell Subsets to Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Vasculopathy 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Loss of Fas-signaling in pro-fibrotic fibroblasts impairs homeostatic fibrosis resolution and promotes persistent pulmonary fibrosis 96%
- Spatial transcriptomic characterization of COVID-19 pneumonitis identifies immune circuits related to tissue injury 95%
- Impact of cell culture on the transcriptomic programs of primary and iPSC-derived human alveolar type 2 cells 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- IRE1α drives lung epithelial progenitor dysfunction to establish a niche for pulmonary fibrosis 96%
- ATF4 and mTOR regulate metabolic reprogramming in TGF-β-treated lung fibroblasts 96%
- Post-transcriptional regulation of IFI16 promotes inflammatory endothelial pathophenotypes observed in pulmonary arterial hypertension 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Serum proteome analysis of systemic JIA and related pulmonary alveolar proteinosis identifies distinct inflammatory programs 92%
- Activin A-activated ALK4 induces pathogenic Th17 involvement in endothelial–mesenchymal transition in systemic lupus erythematosus-associated pulmonary arterial hypertension 92%
- Nuclear receptor subfamily 4A signaling as a key disease pathway of CD1c+ dendritic cell dysregulation in systemic sclerosis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.