Reliability of remote self-administered web-based digital cognitive measures and comparison to in-person neuropsychological tests: Stricker Learning Span, Symbols Test and the Mayo Test Drive Screening Battery Composite
Hughes, M. A.; Frank, R. D.; Taylor, R. L.; Fan, W. Z.; Christianson, T. J.; Kremers, W. K.; Stricker, J. L.; Machulda, M. M.; Hassenstab, J.; Mielke, M. M.; Lucas, J. A.; Aduen, P. A.; Day, G. S.; Graff-Radford, N. R.; Jack, C. R.; Graff-Radford, J.; Petersen, R. C.; Stricker, N. H.
Show abstract
Structured AbstractO_ST_ABSINTRODUCTIONC_ST_ABSWe describe the reliability of remote self-administered digital cognitive measures completed via the Mayo Test Drive (MTD) web-based platform. METHODS1,846 participants (mean age=70, SD=12, range 31-101; 48% male; 96% White; 99% non-Hispanic; 97% cognitively unimpaired) with 2-4 complete MTD sessions at ~7.5-month intervals were included. Test-retest reliability was assessed using single-rating, absolute-agreement, and two-way mixed intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) with 95% confidence intervals. ICCs for in-person-administered traditional neuropsychological measures were compared to MTD for a subset of 244 participants. RESULTSReliability was good for the MTD Composite [total ICC = 0.79 (0.77, 0.80)], and moderate-to-good for the primary outcome variables for each MTD subtest [total ICCs 0.70-0.83 for Stricker Learning Span and Symbols]. The reliability of the remote self-administered MTD was similar to in-person-administered cognitive measures. DISCUSSIONMTD showed moderate-to-good reliability, supporting its use in longitudinal monitoring.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Feasibility and reliability of online vs in-person cognitive testing in healthy older people 97%
- The Healthy Brain Initiative (HBI): A prospective cohort study protocol 96%
- The Healthy Brain 9 (HB9): A New Instrument to Characterize Subjective Cognitive Decline, and Detect Anosognosia in Mild Cognitive Impairment 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- The New Therapeutics in Alzheimer’s Disease Longitudinal Cohort study (NTAD): study protocol 95%
- Returning Research Results That Indicate Risk of Alzheimer Disease Dementia to Healthy Participants in Longitudinal Studies (WeSHARE) 94%
- Optimising activity and diet compositions for dementia prevention: Protocol for the ACTIVate prospective longitudinal cohort study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Association between motor task acquisition and hippocampal atrophy across cognitively unimpaired, amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment, and Alzheimer’s disease individuals 94%
- Race/Ethnic Disparities in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: The Northern Manhattan Study 93%
- High frequency post-pause word choices and task-dependent speech behavior characterize connected speech in individuals with mild cognitive impairment 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.