Back

A neural network model of free recall learns multiple memory strategies

Li, M.; Jensen, K. T.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, Q.; Mattar, M. G.

2026-07-06 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.25.678592 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Humans exhibit structured patterns of memory recall, including a tendency to recall more recent information and to recall events in the same order they were experienced. Classic computational models explain these patterns by positing that memories incorporate the ongoing ''temporal context'', formed by smoothly integrating the stimulus history. However, it is unclear whether a single mechanism can account for the full repertoire of human memory strategies, as the optimal approach may be task-dependent. For example, human memory experts widely apply the ''memory palace'' strategy, which is empirically better but not captured by temporal context models. Here we show that neural networks optimized for free recall develop diverse retrieval strategies, with only some of them resembling temporal context models.The best-performing models discovered a stimulus-invariant index code that emphasizes the studied position of each list item, instead of its temporal context. This creates a stable scaffold for forward recall akin to the memory palace technique. This index code was more likely to emerge when networks were i) encouraged to recall all studied items rather than prioritizing a few items, and ii) prevented from relying on recency, resonating with human data. Our findings demonstrate that human-like recall patterns can arise from multiple distinct computational mechanisms, and that sequential retrieval using item index is an optimal strategy that explains expert-level recall performance.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
30.6%
2
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 3%
11.7%
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.8%
50% of probability mass above
4
Psychological Review
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.4%
5
Nature Human Behaviour
95 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.4%
6
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 28%
4.3%
7
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.7%
8
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.4%
9
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.1%
10
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
11
Neural Networks
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
12
Communications Psychology
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
13
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
14
Neuron
337 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
15
Cognitive Neurodynamics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
17
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.0%
18
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
135 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
19
PLOS Biology
486 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.0%
20
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
21
NeuroImage
903 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
22
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Patterns
78 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.8%
25
Learning & Memory
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
26
Physical Review Letters
47 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
27
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
28
Cell Reports
1498 papers in training set
Top 30%
0.6%
29
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
30
Journal of Neurophysiology
302 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%