Back

A stromatoporoid-like sediment-agglutinating sponge from microbialites of Cambrian Stage 4

Luo, C.; Reitner, J.; Sun, Z.; Chen, K.

2025-09-28 paleontology
10.1101/2025.09.25.678569 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Many extant demosponges, especially the non-spicular taxa, incorporate foreign detritus in their spongin or chitinous skeletons. This supposed energy-efficient way of skeleton construction is, however, rarely known in the fossil record. In this study, based on careful petrographic analyses using standard optical microscopy, cathodoluminescence and fluorescence microscopy, and a three-dimensional reconstruction, a fossil from the Cambrian Stage 4 of Xuzhou City, Jiangsu Province, China, is established as a sediment-agglutinating sponge Psammolectospongia beiwangensis gen. et sp. nov. These fossils encrust stromatolitic microbialites and are often surrounded by Girvanella mats. This succession of microbialites and sponge fossils was developed in a turbulent hydrodynamic condition after the deposition of edgewise conglomerates. P. beiwangensis possesses labyrinthine skeletons with an architecture similar to that of some stromatoporoids, such as Stromatopora and Syringostromella, although dissepiments are absent in the Cambrian fossil. The skeleton of P. beiwangensis is mainly composed of packed silt-to sand-sized detritus grains and skeletal fragments of other animals, while in some places, it can contain various proportions of micrites. The morphology and skeletal composition of P. beiwangensis indicate an affinity to an agglutinating demosponge, which mainly constructed its skeleton using agglutinated and incorporated sediments, while the spongin skeleton was able to be biomineralized like that of Vaceletia. This study is the first report of a sponge fossil that mainly built its skeleton using foreign detritus, and it expands our knowledge about the physiology and ecological behaviors of early Paleozoic demosponges.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 2%
14.8%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 15%
12.7%
3
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 7%
9.4%
4
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
8.7%
5
National Science Review
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
6
Interface Focus
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
7
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.8%
8
PNAS Nexus
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.7%
9
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
3.2%
10
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
11
Environmental Pollution
35 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
12
mSystems
361 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.3%
13
Environmental Microbiome
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
14
The ISME Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
15
Microbiome
139 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
16
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
17
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
18
Science China Life Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
20
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.8%
21
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.8%
22
Peer Community Journal
254 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Neuroscience
223 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
25
Science of The Total Environment
179 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
Journal of Proteome Research
215 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%