Back

Exploring the potential for scanning electron microscopy/focused ion beam - based diffraction for screening cryo-transmission electron microscopy samples

Woods, E. V.; Wigge, C.; Zhao, Y.; de Kloe, R.; Schwarz, T. M.; Britton, B.; Zaefferer, S.; Gault, B.

2025-09-27 molecular biology
10.1101/2025.09.25.678486 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The study of biological and organic materials at high resolution using cryogenic transmission-electron microscopy (cryo-TEM) necessitates vitrification to preserve the native structure. Assessing sample integrity is essential, particularly as ice crystallization during freezing and handling can cause irrecoverable structural damage. Usually, a secondary cryo-TEM is used for initial screening, only possible after a time-consuming sample preparation workflow. In the present work, we propose simple methods that exploit existing workflows developed for materials science analyses and demonstrate on-grid in situ assessment of ice crystallinity with electron backscatter diffraction (EBSD) on a direct electron detector (DED) in a cryo-scanning-electron microscope (SEM). This evaluation step can be performed prior to sample preparation for cryo-TEM by using cryogenic focused ion beam (cryo-FIB) milling. Custom grid holders and jigs were developed to integrate the clipped cryo-TEM grids and evolve the sample preparation workflow. EBSD detects hexagonal ice in some areas of the samples, whereas other areas show an absence of EBSD signal, consistent with vitreous ice, that enable targeting the further steps of sample preparation for cryo-TEM. Off-axis transmission Kikuchi diffraction (TKD) was attempted, but led to severe damage to polished TEM-lamellae and appears unsuitable. A proof-of-concept lift-out from a clipped cryo-TEM grid mounted on a support is introduced, demonstrating possibilities for expanded cryogenic correlative workflows beyond the acceleration of sample screening for cryo-TEM.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Structural Biology
58 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
43.3%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.4%
50% of probability mass above
3
Nanoscale Advances
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.3%
4
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 32%
3.9%
5
IUCrJ
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
6
Journal of Applied Crystallography
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.6%
7
Journal of Structural Biology: X
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.8%
8
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
9
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
54 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
10
Optics Express
23 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
11
Data in Brief
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
12
Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
218 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.0%
13
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.0%
14
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
15
Journal of Microscopy
18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.0%
16
BMC Methods
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
17
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 58%
1.0%
18
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 20%
0.9%
19
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.8%
21
Frontiers in Microbiology
375 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.5%
22
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
100 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%