Back

Combining brain-wide activity imaging with electron microscopy reveals a distributed nociceptive network in the brain

Randel, N.; Wang, C.; Clayton, M. S.; Wang, K.; Pang, S.; Xu, S. C.; Champion, A.; Hess, H. F.; Cardona, A.; Keller, P. J.; Zlatic, M.

2026-03-19 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.25.678485 bioRxiv
Show abstract

To understand how brains work, it is necessary to connect neural activity to synaptic-resolution circuit architecture. Recent advances in light-sheet microscopy (LSM) enable whole-brain, cellular-resolution imaging of activity of all neuronal cell bodies, however, most neurons from such datasets cannot be identified. In most organisms, neurons are identifiable based on their projections (and not based on their cell body position) which, when densely labelled, cannot be resolved using LSM. Here, we present a novel methodology to overcome this by combining whole-brain activity imaging with subsequent volume electron microscopy imaging of the same brain to visualise neuronal projections and identify neurons with interesting activity. We used this approach to identify brain neurons involved in nociception in Drosophila larva. After whole-brain imaging of activity during nociceptive stimulation, we imaged the same brain with an enhanced focused ion-beam electron microscope (eFIB-SEM). We registered the functional and anatomical volumes and reconstructed (in the eFIB-SEM volume) the projections of neurons that responded to nociceptive stimulation to determine their developmental lineage and identity. This revealed a distributed nociceptive network spanning 25 distinct lineages and many distinct brain areas, and included direct brain targets of nociceptive projection neurons that integrate nociceptive information with other sensory modalities, as well as brain output neurons (descending neurons [DN]) that likely contribute to action-selection. Our workflow provides a powerful framework for mapping neuronal activity onto structure across an entire brain, yielding novel insights into the distributed central processing of noxious stimuli.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
22.6%
2
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 5%
10.5%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 25%
7.2%
4
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 5%
6.3%
5
Neuron
282 papers in training set
Top 2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
6
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 6%
4.0%
7
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
8
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
3.6%
9
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.9%
10
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 10%
2.6%
11
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 20%
2.4%
12
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.9%
13
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.7%
14
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
15
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.7%
16
Nature Neuroscience
216 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
17
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.5%
18
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 35%
1.5%
19
Journal of Cell Biology
333 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
20
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.2%
21
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 14%
1.2%
22
Optica
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.0%
23
Development
440 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
24
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.7%
25
Current Biology
596 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.7%
26
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.6%