Back

The two sides of resistance: aggressiveness and mitotic instability as the Achilles heel of Osimertinib-resistant NSCLC

Armanetti, P.; Cabrera San Millan, E.; Mercatelli, R.; Cavallini, C.; Chiodi, A.; Mosca, E.; Consiglio, A.; Losito, N.; Menichetti, L.; Bramanti, E.; Ali, A.; Levantini, E.; Maroni, G.

2025-09-28 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.09.25.678204 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents majority of lung cancer cases and remains a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Tumors carrying activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are highly sensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), with third-generation inhibitors such as Osimertinib now established as standard of care. However, acquired resistance to Osimertinib inevitably develops, involving both genetic and non-genetic mechanisms, the latter playing a major role in sustaining cellular plasticity and promoting tumor aggressiveness. Among regulators of adaptive programs, the Polycomb protein BMI1 has emerged as a key factor driving stemness, epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and therapy resistance in multiple cancers, yet its role in Osimertinib resistance remains poorly defined. Here, we show that Osimertinib-resistant H1975 cells, which display greater aggressiveness than their parental counterparts, are enriched in BMI1 target genes and mitotic cell-cycle pathways, establishing a dependency on microtubule dynamics and mitotic control. Functionally, BMI1 drives migration, invasiveness, and tumor progression in resistant cells. This mitotic dependency creates a therapeutic vulnerability that can be exploited with Unesbulin (PTC596), a BMI1 inhibitor that destabilizes microtubules and induces mitotic catastrophe, thereby effectively suppressing tumor growth in vitro and in vivo. Our findings establish BMI1 as a central mediator of Osimertinib resistance and provide a mechanistic and therapeutic rationale for targeting BMI1 and mitotic weaknesses in refractory EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.