Cognition and metacognition in functional motor symptoms and functional seizures: A case-control study
Pick, S.; Millman, L. S. M.; Gursoy, E. G.; Basamh, Y.; Uloyok-Job, J.; Davies, J.; Blunstone, L.; Bhuma, S.; Coebergh, J.; David, A. S.; Edwards, M. J.; Goldstein, L. H.; Hodsoll, J.; Mehta, M. A.; Nicholson, T. R.; Stanton, B.; Winston, J. S.; Hotopf, M.; Chalder, T.
Show abstract
BackgroundCognitive symptoms are common in functional neurological disorder (FND), yet there is inconsistent evidence of impaired neurocognitive test performance in this population. We aimed to assess core cognitive functions and global metacognition in patients with functional seizures (FS) and functional motor symptoms (FMS), and to explore relationships between cognition, metacognition, and cognitive symptoms in these groups. MethodsThis single-centre case-control study recruited participants with FS (n=50) and FMS (n=50), in addition to age- and gender-matched healthy controls (HC, n=50), and clinical controls with depression and/or anxiety disorders (CC, n=50). The Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery was used to assess response speed, working memory, executive functions, and social-emotional processing, with subjective confidence rated for each test. Validated measures quantified intellectual functioning, performance validity, and global cognitive symptoms. FindingsImpaired performance was demonstrated in both FND groups for sustained attention (p=0.03-<0.001) and set-shifting (p=0.01-0.001), withstanding correction for response speed, education, intellectual functioning, and psychotropic medication. Performance validity was comparable between groups. The FND groups reported reduced confidence for sustained attention performance (p<0.001) and elevated cognitive symptoms (p<0.001). Executive performance deficits correlated with reduced test-specific confidence in FS/FMS (p=0.02-<0.001). In FMS, confidence for sustained attention correlated negatively with cognitive symptoms (p=0.002). Cognitive symptoms were associated with psychological/physical symptom load, quality-of-life, and/or general functioning in FND and CC groups (p=0.04-<0.001). InterpretationPatients with FS and FMS displayed deficits in executive functioning performance, with intact metacognitive awareness, alongside significant cognitive complaints. These neurocognitive features were associated with poorer clinical status, warranting interventions targeting cognitive control and/or cognitive symptoms in everyday life. FundingThis study was funded by a Medical Research Council Career Development Award granted to SP [MR/V032771/1]. This project also represents independent research part-funded by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and Kings College London.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Cognition and Future Depression: Associations with Risk in Those With and Without a History of Depression 92%
- Socioeconomic status and severe mental disorders: A Bidirectional Multivariable Mendelian Randomisation Study 91%
- Premenstrual disorders and risk of sick leave and unemployment: a prospective cohort study of 15,857 women in Sweden 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolic Disturbances, Hemoglobin A1c, and Social Cognition Impairment in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders 94%
- Chronic post-COVID neuropsychiatric symptoms persisting beyond one year from infection: a case-control study and network analysis 93%
- Predicting remission after internet-delivered psychotherapy in patients with depression using machine learning and multi-modal data 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Primary progressive aphasia in Italian and English: a cross-linguistic cohort study 91%
- Baseline Semantic Fluency Is Associated with Six-Year Progression to Mild Cognitive Impairment in Middle-Aged Men 91%
- Cognitive impairment is differentially associated with depression and anxiety at six-months post-stroke 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.