Policies, practices, and experiences of European biobanks on sharing genomic biobank results with donors - a survey of BBMRI-ERIC biobanks
Brunfeldt, M.; Vrijenhoek, T.; Kaariainen, H.
Show abstract
To study European biobanks policies, practices, and experiences on communicating individual research results to participants the EU Horizon 2020 Project Genetics Clinic of the Future performed two surveys in 2016 and 2020. First, a questionnaire was sent in 2016 (Survey I) to 351 European biobanks in 13 countries that were members of Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Research Infrastructure - European Research Infrastructure Consortium (BBMRI-ERIC). We received replies from 72 biobanks (response rate 21%), representing each of the 13 BBMRI Member States. Respondents were mainly directors or heads of biobanks. To evaluate how the policies and practices of biobanks evolved over time, we also conducted another survey in 2020 (Survey II). The Survey I was implemented using a web based Webropol tool, and the Survey II was distributed by email. The biobanks had very different policies of sharing genomic data and the policies had changed over time. The percentage of biobanks with a policy to share results with participants if they so wish had increased between 2016-2020 from 36% to 45%. On the contrary, the percentage of biobanks with a policy to pro-actively re-contact the participants to share (some) results had decreased from 52% to 39%. Still in 2020, half of the biobanks had never shared results with participants.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Re-contacting biobank participants: lessons from a pilot study within FinnGen 93%
- Sunshine on KOL : a retrospective study about financial ties between medical key opinion leaders and pharmaceutical industry in France 89%
- Genetic, lifestyle and environmental influences on health - a Finnish biobank recall study protocol (BioRecall) 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comprehensive cancer-oriented biobanking resource of human samples for studies of post-zygotic genetic variation involved in cancer predisposition 91%
- Feedback of Individual Genetic and Genomics Research Results: A Qualitative Study Involving Grassroots Communities in Uganda 89%
- ChatGPT- versus human-generated answers to frequently asked questions about diabetes: a Turing test-inspired survey among employees of a Danish diabetes center 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Diagnostic Yield of Exome Sequencing in a Diverse Pediatric and Prenatal Population is not Associated with Genetic Ancestry 87%
- Comprehensive reanalysis for CNVs in ES data from unsolved rare disease cases results in new diagnoses 86%
- Biallelic truncation variants in ATP9A are associated with a novel autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- biobank.cy: The Biobank of Cyprus past, present and future 93%
- Genetic profiling of Vietnamese population from large-scale genomic analysis of non-invasive prenatal testing data 88%
- High Precision Characterization Of Rccx Rearrangements In A 21-Hydroxylase Deficiency Latin American Cohort Using Oxford Nanopore Long Read Sequencing 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Insights into the Datasets, Tools, and Training Needs of the AnVIL Community: 2024 88%
- A cross-sectional audit and survey of Open Science and Data Sharing practices at The Montreal Neurological Institute-Hospital 88%
- HGNChelper: Identification and correction of invalid gene symbols for human and mouse 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.