Back

Tattoos and risk of cutaneous melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in France

Mo, T.; Zins, M.; Ribet, C.; Kab, S.; Schreiver, I.; Siewert, K.; Ezzedine, K.; Schuz, J.; Foerster, M.

2025-09-27 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.09.25.25336614
Show abstract

BackgroundWith the increasing popularity of decorative tattooing, which entails the intradermal injection of inks that may contain carcinogens, investigating the related potential skin cancer risk is a public health priority. MethodsWe used data from the Cancer Risk Attributable with the Body Art of Tattooing (CRABAT) study, nested in the French national cohort Constances (adults aged 18-69 years recruited in 2012-2018). Tattoo exposure was collected in 2020-23. Skin cancers overall, cutaneous melanoma (CM), and non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) diagnosed during 2007-21 were retrieved from national health insurance data. As exposure information was collected after possible disease ascertainment, risks of skin cancer with prior tattoo exposure were assessed using (i) Logistic regression and (ii) retrospective cohort analyses using Cox proportional hazards model. ResultsAmong 111 074 participants, 1789 skin cancers (1.6%) were recorded (693 CM, 1096 NMSC). No association was found between binary tattoo exposure and any skin cancer type. In logistic regression, tattoo body surface >2 hand palms was associated with lower overall skin cancer risk (OR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.83; reference no tattoos). This association was not significant in the Cox model, but the suggestive dose-response relationship remained, with HRs of 1.14, 0.60, and 0.26 for tattoo body surface of 0-1, 1-2, and >2 hand palms, respectively. ConclusionLarge tattoo surfaces were tentatively associated with reduced overall skin cancer risk. While these finding merits further research, small case numbers and the retrospectively collected data might have biased the results.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
based on 13 papers
Top 0.1%
12.3%
2
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 47%
11.0%
3
International Journal of Cancer
based on 18 papers
Top 0.3%
6.3%
4
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 44%
4.4%
5
BMC Public Health
based on 148 papers
Top 8%
2.9%
6
Cancers
based on 57 papers
Top 4%
2.8%
7
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention
based on 14 papers
Top 1%
2.5%
8
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
based on 116 papers
Top 10%
2.4%
9
Spatial and Spatio-temporal Epidemiology
based on 10 papers
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 37%
2.3%
11
British Journal of Cancer
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
2.2%
50% of probability mass above
12
Frontiers in Medicine
based on 99 papers
Top 10%
1.7%
13
Nature Communications
based on 483 papers
Top 29%
1.7%
14
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
based on 115 papers
Top 10%
1.6%
15
BMC Cancer
based on 21 papers
Top 4%
1.3%
16
Environmental Research
based on 36 papers
Top 3%
1.3%
17
eLife
based on 262 papers
Top 23%
1.3%
18
JAMA Network Open
based on 125 papers
Top 15%
1.2%
19
PeerJ
based on 46 papers
Top 8%
1.2%
20
Eurosurveillance
based on 77 papers
Top 7%
1.2%
21
Genes
based on 21 papers
Top 2%
0.8%
22
American Journal of Epidemiology
based on 54 papers
Top 6%
0.8%
23
International Journal of Epidemiology
based on 65 papers
Top 8%
0.8%
24
BMC Medicine
based on 155 papers
Top 22%
0.8%
25
Emerging Infectious Diseases
based on 84 papers
Top 11%
0.8%
26
Science of The Total Environment
based on 80 papers
Top 4%
0.8%
27
Environment International
based on 22 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
28
Journal of Travel Medicine
based on 17 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
29
Breast Cancer Research
based on 11 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Preventive Medicine
based on 11 papers
Top 0.7%
0.7%