Global dynamics of antibiotic resistance: a modeling study of the spread of endemic and emerging resistance in E. coli
Rahbe, E.; Valdano, E.; Smith, D. R.; Guillemot, D.; Cauchemez, S.; Glaser, P.; Opatowski, L.
Show abstract
BackgroundAntibiotic resistance (ABR) poses a growing threat at the global level. Emergence and worldwide dissemination of multi-resistant clones are frequently reported. However, associated drivers are still largely unknown and are a crucial knowledge to mitigate ABR risk in humans. MethodsWe used mechanistic modeling to analyze annual trends of extended-spectrum {beta}-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) in 39 countries over 2006-2019. The model formalizes ESBL-EC transmission, colonization and infection at the country and global levels, accounting for heterogeneous antibiotic prescriptions and human mobility. The fitted model is used to explore hypothetical scenarios of emerging antibiotic-resistant clones like carbapenem-resistant E. coli (CR-EC) and evaluate their global dissemination risk. FindingsInternational travels alone do not explain heterogeneous ESBL-EC dynamics. Reproducing observed trends requires accounting for antibiotics impact on ESBL-EC acquisition and heterogeneous within-country transmission rates. Strong differences in transmission rates are inferred between Europe and South-East Asia, ranging on average from 7.05x10-3 day-1 in Spain to 16.21x10-3 day-1 in Thailand. For CR-EC, spatiotemporal dynamics depends on the explored emergence scenario. We show that mobility patterns drive 5-years resistance dynamics, while 20-years dynamics are mostly predicted by within-country transmission and antibiotic use. InterpretationThis spatiotemporal analysis highlights the weight of international travel in the early global dissemination of antibiotic-resistant clones but suggests that reducing transmission and selection pressure is fundamental to avoid fixation. There is a need to strengthen surveillance and data collection of community colonization and infection to refine modeling and support decision and ABR control at the global scale. FundingPfizer independent medical grant (number 57504809)
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Revealing the drivers of antibiotic resistance trends in Streptococcus pneumoniae amidst the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from mathematical modeling 95%
- Quantifying antibiotic impact on within-host dynamics of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase resistance in hospitalized patients 95%
- Metapopulation ecology links antibiotic resistance, consumption and patient transfers in a network of hospital wards 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Revealing antibiotic cross-resistance patterns in hospitalized patients through Bayesian network modelling 91%
- Estimating the cost of antibiotic use on future collateral resistance: a retrospective comparison of cefuroxime versus cefazolin and amoxicillin/clavulanate 90%
- Microevolution of acquired colistin resistance in Enterobacteriaceae from ICU patients receiving selective decontamination of the digestive tract. 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Examining face-mask usage as an effective strategy to control COVID-19 spread 92%
- Infection control strategies in essential industries: using COVID-19 in the food industry to model economic and public health trade-offs 92%
- Identifying likely transmission pairs with pathogen sequence data using Kolmogorov Forward Equations; an application to M.bovis in cattle and badgers 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modelling addition and replacement mechanisms of plasmid-based beta-lactam resistant E. coli infections 95%
- Drug-target binding quantitatively predicts optimal antibiotic dose levels 94%
- Population structure across scales facilitates coexistence and spatial heterogeneity of antibiotic-resistant infections 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.