It is Not Always Crystal Clear: In-Pocket Analysis for Understanding Binding Site Microenvironment Properties
Menezes, F. M. C. M.; Froehlich, T.; Schofield, L. C.; Cremer, J.; Agirre, J.; Joosten, R. P.; Murshudov, G. N.; Plettenburg, O.; Sattler, M.; Popowicz, G. M.
Show abstract
Structural biology enabled key advances in biochemistry, drug discovery, and AI-driven three-dimensional structure modelling. Despite its importance, reliable and general computational tools for chemical validation of structural models remain limited, especially when small-molecule ligands are involved. This challenge is exacerbated when experimental resolution is insufficient to define interaction chemistry, leaving critical interpretations ambiguous. We introduce In-Pocket, a quantum mechanical optimisation method biased by experimental data that evaluates the chemical nature of protein-ligand binding interfaces. In-Pocket improves model quality, corrects chemically inconsistent structures, and identifies the energetically most favourable ligand-conformers within biomacromolecular complexes. The approach is generally applicable to a wide range of systems, including those containing transition metals. Benchmarking demonstrates that In-Pocket enhances the reliability of legacy and newly solved structures. With automated, user-friendly routine chemical validation, In-Pocket offers unique opportunities to improve the integrity of structural databases and impact diverse domains: from molecular biology to rational drug design and application of generative AI.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using macromolecular electron densities to improve the enrichment of active compounds in virtual screening 94%
- EVOSYNTH: Enabling Multi-Target Drug Discovery through Latent Evolutionary Optimization and Synthesis-Aware Prioritization 94%
- Deep generative modeling of temperature-dependent structural ensembles of proteins 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.