Back

Evidence of ecosystem process recovery across a large-scale coral reef restoration programme using AI accelerated soundscape analysis

Williams, B.; Mars Coral Restoration Project Monitoring Team, ; Naseem, A.; Nava, G.; Roberts, A.; Nicholson, F.; du Luart, A.; Erasmus, D.; Stoole, O.; Whittick, A.; Gibb, R.; Razak, T. B.; Lamont, T. A. C.; Simpson, S. D.; Curnick, D. J.; Jones, K. E.

2025-09-27 ecology
10.1101/2025.09.24.678197 bioRxiv
Show abstract

1.Coral reef restoration efforts are on the increase globally. However, reporting on the ecological outcomes of these efforts is rare and typically focuses on coral related metrics. As a result, understanding of whether restoration can recover broader aspects of reef functioning remains limited. In this study we use passive acoustic monitoring coupled with human-in-the-loop artificial intelligence to analyse >12 months of soundscape recordings from 45 sites across five biogeographically independent regions to investigate the impact of active restoration on reef functioning. We trained and rigorously evaluated machine learning models to identify 34 biological sound types within this data, generating >912,000 high-confidence detections. These detections were used to infer four key functions across healthy, degraded, early-stage (<3 months) and mid-stage (32-53 months) restored reefs. Restoration significantly enhanced: (i) biological sounds at night, key to recruiting juvenile fish; (ii) diversity of biological sounds, an indicator of fish community diversity; and (iii) snapping shrimp activity, an indicator of bioturbation. However, effects varied by region, and audible parrotfish grazing, key to algal control and bioerosion, did not differ among habitat types in four of the five regions. Our findings provide evidence that restoration can support recovery of broader ecosystem functioning when carefully implemented in the right contexts. Graphical abstract O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=174 SRC="FIGDIR/small/678197v4_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (48K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@7d5462org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@2efa7dorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@3f4b9eorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@17d829c_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.