Optical Microscopy Predictions of Focal Recurrence in Glioblastoma
Herr, S.; Olshausen, N.; Pekmezci, M.; Kaur, J.; Sibih, Y.; Ambati, V. S.; Scotford, K.; Persad, A. S.; Picart, T.; Kondepudi, A.; Oberheim-Bush, N. A.; Kim, A.; Young, J.; Berger, M.; Sushil, M.; Hollon, T.; Hervey-Jumper, S.
Show abstract
A hallmark of glioblastoma (GBM) is disease recurrence, which occurs in all patients despite tumor resection, radiation, and chemotherapy. A critical challenge in glioblastoma treatment is the management of recurrent disease, for which there is no standard of care. Predicting the location of glioblastoma recurrence may improve the efficiency of advanced-stage therapies. Here, we present an artificial intelligence (AI)-based model to predict the risk of unprocessed surgical tissues at initial resection. AI-informed label-free optical microscopy was used to generate a normalized tumor infiltration value (AI-infiltration) for whole-slide optical images of samples taken from resection cavity margins. These values, in combination with clinical, radiographic, and molecular variables, were used to build a predictive model of focal recurrence. In a cohort of 80 patients, comprising 367 samples and 133,454 unique images, glioblastoma infiltration was significantly higher in margin samples from recurrent tumors (p = 0.026) compared with those from non-recurrent tumors. A random forest (RF) machine learning classifier was able to predict site recurrence with an average area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 86.6% {+/-} 10.0 for the training cohort and 80.3% (95% CI: 0.641-0.965) for the validation cohort. AI-infiltration was the strongest contributor to recurrence prediction, outperforming tumor molecular features. Model performance remained high regardless of tumor location, resulting in random forest model predictions of recurrence at 5 and 10 millimeters of each sampled site. These findings represent the potential of AI to predict sites of tumor recurrence, thereby improving accessibility to targeted, precision, multimodal therapy for the highest-risk areas of disease. One Sentence Summary: Machine learning estimates of tumor infiltration predict focal glioblastoma recurrence.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Diffusion Histology Imaging Combining Diffusion Basis Spectrum Imaging (DBSI) and Machine Learning Improves Detection and Classification of Glioblastoma Pathology 95%
- Preclinical modeling of surgery and steroid therapy for glioblastoma reveals changes in immunophenotype that are associated with tumor growth and outcome 95%
- Remote Neuroinflammation in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Correlates with Unfavorable Clinical Outcome 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- MRI Elastography Identifies Regions of Extracellular Matrix Reorganization Associated with Shorter Survival in Glioblastoma Patients 94%
- Single-nucleus analysis characterizes non-enhancing region of recurrent high-grade glioma 93%
- Tumor Edge-to-Core Transition Promotes Malignancy in Primary-to-Recurrent Glioblastoma Progression in a PLAGL1/CD109-mediated mechanism 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of MRI radiomics and germline genetics to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas 96%
- Single-Cell Spatial Proteomics Analyses of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Reveal Tumor Heterogeneity and Immune Architectures Associated with Clinical Outcome 93%
- First-in-human prospective trial of sonobiopsy in glioblastoma patients using neuronavigation-guided focused ultrasound 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Spatial profiling of longitudinal glioblastoma reveals consistent changes in cellular architecture, post-treatment 93%
- A non-local diffusion magnetic resonance imaging tract density biomarker to stratify, predict, and interpret survival rates in human glioblastoma 93%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Characterisation of Radionecrotic Changes in Glioblastoma Patients 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.