Effectiveness of analgesic ear drops as add-on treatment to usual care in children with acute otitis media: the OPTIMA pragmatic randomised controlled trial
de Sevaux, J. L. H.; Damoiseaux, R. A. M. J.; Schilder, A. G. M.; Zuithoff, N. P. A.; Venekamp, R. P.
Show abstract
BackgroundClinical practice guidelines recommend oral analgesics for all children with acute otitis media (AOM), and antibiotics for selected cases. Analgesic ear drops could be a promising add-on treatment, but evidence for their effectiveness is limited. Despite being available over-the-counter, they are rarely used in daily practice. AimTo establish whether analgesic ear drops added to usual care provides superior ear pain relief over usual care alone in children presenting to general practice with AOM. Design and settingPragmatic, open label, two arm, individually randomised, superiority trial in 35 general practices in the Netherlands between October 2021 and January 2024. MethodsChildren with AOM and ear pain were randomly allocated to either 1) lidocaine hydrochloride 5mg/g ear drops 1-2 drops up to six times daily for a maximum of 7 days in addition to usual care (oral analgesics with or without antibiotics) or 2) usual care. The primary outcome, parent-reported ear pain score (0-10) over the first 3 days, was analysed with a linear regression model accounting for repeated measurements, adjusting for time, baseline ear pain score, age [≤]2 vs >2 years, uni-vs bilateral AOM, and baseline antibiotic prescribing. Secondary outcomes were reported descriptively. ResultsWith 29 of a planned 300 children enrolled between Oct 2021 and Jan 2024 (15 intervention, 14 control; mean age 2.6 years (SD 1.5), 62% boys), the trial was ended prematurely due to slow accrual. Analyses were conducted for 28 participants with complete data. No significant difference in mean parent-reported pain scores over the first three days was observed between children receiving analgesic ear drops in addition to usual care and those receiving usual care alone (mean difference 0.14, 95% CI -2.00 to 2.28). Local discomfort and difficulties during administration of the analgesic ear drops were reported in 71.4% (10/14) and 50% (7/14) of children, respectively. ReflectionsEarly termination of this trial does not allow for conclusions on the effectiveness of analgesic ear drops as add-on treatment in children with AOM. Our experience underscores the substantial challenges of delivering prospective trials in general practice, and underlines the need for collaborative and viable recruitment infrastructures. Combining individual participant trial data from existing trials may help provide more robust conclusions. Trial registrationThe Netherlands Trial Register; NL9500. Date of registration: 28 May 2021.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital thErapy For Improved tiNnitus carE Study (DEFINE): Protocol for a Randomised Controlled Trial 94%
- Supporting Respiratory Epithelia and Lowering Inflammation to Effectively Treat Common Cold Symptoms: A Randomized Controlled Trial 93%
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of osteotomy technique (flat-cut vs wedge-cut Weil) on pain relief and complication incidence following surgical treatment for patients presenting with metatarsalgia in a private metropolitan clinic: Protocol for a randomised controlled trial 93%
- Evaluating Diuretics in Normal Care (EVIDENCE): Protocol of a cluster randomised controlled equivalence trial of prescribing policy to compare the effectiveness of thiazide-type diuretics in hypertension. 91%
- Decision support system to evaluate VENTilation in the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (DeVENT study) – Trial Protocol 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A single centre randomised, feasibility study using point-of-care (POC) testing for respiratory viruses to direct oral corticosteroids use in preschool-aged children with acute wheeze. A Protocol. 91%
- Mobile Phone Virtual Reality Game for Pediatric Home Burn Dressing Pain Management, a Randomized Clinical Trial 91%
- The MultimorbiditY COllaborative Medication Review And DEcision Making (MyComrade) study: A protocol for a cross-border pilot cluster randomised controlled trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness of Ear Nose and Throat outreach programs for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians: a systematic review 93%
- The DEXACELL Trial; a protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, parallel group, phase 3 superiority trial to assess the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of DEXAmethasone as an adjunctive therapy for the management of CELLulitis in adults presenting to urgent secondary care in the UK 92%
- Clinical And Cost-Effectiveness Of A Personalised Guided Consultation Versus Usual Physiotherapy Care In People Presenting With Shoulder Pain: A Protocol For The Panda-S Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial And Process Evaluation 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of antibiotic consumption on self-reported recovery from uncomplicated urinary tract infection 90%
- Trends and variation in unsafe prescribing of methotrexate: a cohort study in English NHS primary care. 90%
- Colchicine for COVID-19 in adults in the community (PRINCIPLE): a randomised, controlled, adaptive platform trial 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.