Assessing contamination in DNA extraction kits commonly used for microbiome research
Rabasco, J. T.; Kisthardt, S. C.; Theriot, C. M.; Callahan, B. J.
Show abstract
Sequencing-based measurements are now routinely used to investigate the microbial world, however, contamination by DNA outside the intended sample remains a problem. Contaminants obscure the true microbial signal and can lead to misleading scientific interpretations. Much work has been done to address the effects of these contaminants including best practices as outlined in Eisenhofer et al. and Fierer et al. Yet, even with best practices in place, the current literature consensus is that contaminants remain impactful, at least in low biomass environments (5, 7, 11, 13, 16). One well-known source of contaminants are those found within DNA extraction kits, as was shown clearly in the pioneering work of Salter et al. 2012 and Karstens et al. 2019. However, given the rapid evolution of DNA sequencing methods, it would be worthwhile to revisit the issue of contaminants in contemporary DNA extraction kits (the "kitome"). Here we provide an updated characterization of the kitomes of DNA extraction kits commonly used for microbiome research. ImportanceMicrobial contamination in commonly used DNA extraction kits has not been recently assessed. Here we evaluate the contamination in DNA extraction kits commonly used in microbiome studies over the past several years, and provide actionable guidance on appropriate DNA extraction kits for low biomass microbiome measurements.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Library Preparation and Sequencing Platform Introduce Bias in Metagenomic-Based Characterizations of Microbiomes 96%
- rRNA Operon Improves Species-Level Classification of Bacteria and Microbial Community Analysis Compared to 16S rRNA 95%
- Machine-learning based detection of adventitious microbes in T-cell therapy cultures using long read sequencing 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of the effects of library preparation procedure and sample characteristics on the accuracy of metagenomic profiles 95%
- Clade-specific long-read sequencing increases the accuracy and specificity of the gyrB phylogenetic marker gene 95%
- Effects of Variation in Urine Sample Storage Conditions on 16S Urogenital Microbiome Analyses 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accurate and Reproducible Whole-Genome Genotyping for Bacterial Genomic Surveillance with Nanopore Sequencing Data 94%
- The clinical utility of two high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing workflows for taxonomic assignment of unidentifiable bacterial pathogens in MALDI-TOF MS 94%
- Clinical Metagenomic Sequencing for Species Identification and Antimicrobial Resistance Prediction in Orthopaedic Device Infection 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.