Back

Contemporary Endovascular Techniques for Cerebral Aneurysms: Germany-wide In-hospital Outcomes vs. Coiling (2013-2022)

Vagkopoulos, K.; Haverkamp, C.; Kaier, K.; Werner, J.; Shah, M. J.; von zur Muhlen, C.; Beck, J.; Urbach, H.; Meckel, S.

2025-09-25 neurology
10.1101/2025.09.23.25336516 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundClinical and administrative studies suggest better functional outcomes after endovascular treatment (EVT) of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) compared to neurosurgical clipping (NSC). However, it remains unclear whether this applies to modern EVT techniques, such as balloon-assisted coiling (BAC), stent-assisted coiling (SAC), flow diversion (FD), or intrasaccular flow disruption (IFD). This study compares nationwide in-hospital outcomes of modern EVT methods and NSC with standard coiling (SC). MethodsAdministrative data from all German hospitals (2013-2022) were analyzed using billing codes for SC, BAC, SAC, FD, IFD, and NSC in ruptured and unruptured IAs. Primary outcomes included functional independence (discharge type), poor outcomes (US Nationwide Inpatient Sample-Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Outcome Measure [NIS-SOM]), and in-hospital mortality. Propensity score weighting was used for comparisons. ResultsA total of 77,684 procedures were analyzed (46.8% ruptured, 53.2% unruptured). In ruptured IAs, SAC, FD, and NSC were associated with lower functional independence (p=0.001, p=0.007, p<0.001) and higher mortality (p<0.001, p=0.001, p=0.032). Poor outcomes were more frequent after SAC (p=0.001) and NSC (p<0.001). In unruptured IAs, functional independence improved with BAC (p=0.036), SAC (p=0.045), and IFD (p<0.001), but decreased with NSC (p=0.017). Poor outcomes were less frequent with IFD (p<0.001), and mortality was lower with NSC (p=0.020) and IFD (p=0.003). ConclusionsNationwide data from Germany reveal significant differences between EVT techniques and NSC for IA treatment. In ruptured IAs, SAC, FD, and NSC were associated with worse outcomes compared to SC. In unruptured IAs, BAC, SAC, and IFD improved functional outcomes, while NSC was linked to decreased functional outcomes. Notably, IFD consistently demonstrated superior functional outcomes despite limited utilization. Given the limitations of billing data, these findings suggest a potential shift favoring IFD as a safer treatment option in unruptured IAs.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
34.3%
2
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.5%
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 3%
6.6%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 1%
5.0%
6
Stroke
35 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.7%
8
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.2%
9
European Journal of Neurology
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
10
Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
11
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.3%
12
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
13
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
14
Journal of Biomechanics
57 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.0%
15
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
16
Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
17
Neurocritical Care
11 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
Acta Biomaterialia
85 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
19
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
20
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
21
Atherosclerosis
29 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
22
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
23
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
0.5%
25
The Journal of Pediatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.5%