Know before you go! A field survey of the preparedness of wilderness day hikers and trail runners in Rocky Mountain National Park
Lambert, J. T.; Hamer, D. H.; Weckstein, T. N.; Wellenius, G.
Show abstract
IntroductionActively recreating in natural environments enhances physical and mental health, but also carries risk. We aimed to characterize wilderness day hikers and trail runners, and examine factors that predict preparedness. MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey in 4 distinct areas of Rocky Mountain National Park (RMNP) in Colorado during June-August of 2024. English-speaking adults returning from a day hike or trail run were invited to participate. We classified visitors as prepared based on the gear they reported carrying. ResultsOf 801 potential participants approached, 586 (82.3%) day hikers and 68 (76.4%) trail runners agreed to participate. The overall average age was 40.7 years (range 18-82); 50.1% were female; and most common state of residence was Colorado (47.3%). Day hikers tended to be older, travel in larger groups, and spend fewer days in the wilderness per year while trail runners reported higher levels of experience and wilderness preparedness, and were more likely to experience close calls. A minority of participants met our definition of wilderness prepared, about half were altitude prepared, and approximately a quarter did not tell anyone where they were going and when they expected to return. Several measures of experience were associated with preparedness. ConclusionsBoth equipment and knowledge are important for safely enjoying and leaving wilderness settings. Yet many wilderness users in RMNP did not meet our definition of adequate preparation, especially those with less experience. Additional efforts to increase the proportion of wilderness day-users who are prepared may help further improve visitor safety.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The dark side of streaking: Examining the backfire potential of run streaking in recreational runners who broke a long-term streak. 95%
- The effects of sport-specific training on individuals action strategies while avoiding a virtual player approaching on a 45{o} angle while completing a secondary task 94%
- A 29-year retrospective analysis of koala rescues in New South Wales, Australia 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Perception of yips among professional Japanese golfers: perspectives and challenges 93%
- Joint contact forces during barefoot, minimal and conventional shod running are highly individual 92%
- Identifying factors that contribute to collision avoidance behaviours while walking in a natural environment 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Performance and Thermal Perceptions of Runners Competing in the London Marathon: Impact of environmental conditions 93%
- Practical recommendations for staying physically active during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic literature review 92%
- Successful reboot of high-performance sporting activities by Japanese national women’s handball team in Tokyo, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic: An initiative by Japan Sports-Cyber Physical System (JS-CPS) of Sports Research Innovation Project (SRIP) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Sporting tournaments and changed birth rates 9 months later: a systematic review 91%
- Advancements in monitoring: a comparison of traditional and application-based tools for measuring outdoor recreation 91%
- COVID-19 related messaging, beliefs, information sources, and mitigation behaviors in Virginia: A cross-sectional survey in the summer of 2020 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Who participates in ‘participatory design’ of WASH infrastructure: a mixed-methods process evaluation 92%
- Barriers and facilitators to physical activity among Black women: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis 92%
- Epidemiological Patterns of Motorcycle-Related Injuries in Cameroon: A Comparative Analysis of Motorcycle Users and Pedestrians 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.