Multimodal Neuroimaging Signature of Sleep Problems Predicts Preadolescent Mental Health Trajectories
Wang, Y.; Tahmasian, M.; Genon, S.; Samea, F.; He, Z.; Liu, X.; Lei, X.; Eickhoff, S. B.; Dong, D.
Show abstract
Sleep-related problems (SRP) in childhood are common and clinically relevant yet their underlying neural mechanisms and links to future mental health outcomes remain poorly understood. Here, we investigated how distinct dimensions of SRP relate to multimodal brain structure and function in preadolescents, and whether these neural signatures predict trajectories of mental health difficulties. We employed multivariate mapping to investigate the relationship between structural and functional brain network patterns and various dimensions of SRP in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD) dataset. Moreover, we explored whether and how the identified multimodal brain signatures could predict the trajectory of internalizing and externalizing behavior difficulties over a two-year follow-up. Our multivariate analysis revealed two robust dimensions of SRP: a general sleep disturbance dimension and a hypersomnolence and parasomnia dimension. Each was associated with partially distinct patterns of brain morphology and functional connectivity, consistent with their differential alignment along the hierarchical organization of cortical neurodevelopment maps. However, both dimensions shared common disruptions in the somatosensory, attention, and default mode networks. We further observed that only these neural patterns associated with the general sleep disturbance dimension predict the longitudinal trajectories of internalizing/externalizing symptoms. Our findings enhance the understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying dimensions of SRP in preadolescence and could inform brain-based intervention and treatment programs to improve sleep-related and mental health-related outcomes across development.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A Subset of Cortical Areas Exhibit Adult-like Functional Network Patterns in Early Childhood 95%
- A general exposome factor explains individual differences in functional brain network topography and cognition in youth 95%
- Delineating disorder-general and disorder-specific dimensions of psychopathology from functional brain networks in a developmental clinical sample 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gene Expression Associated with Individual Variability in Intrinsic Functional Connectivity 95%
- Associations between brain imaging and polygenic scores of mental health and educational attainment in children aged 9-11 95%
- Connectome-wide structure-function coupling models implicate polysynaptic alterations in autism 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Multimodal neural correlates of childhood psychopathology 97%
- A robust brain network for sustained attention from adolescence to adulthood that predicts later substance use 95%
- An expanding manifold of transmodal regions characterizes adolescent reconfigurations of structural connectome organization 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Structural and Functional Brain-wide Alterations in A350V IQSEC2 Mutant Mice Displaying Autistic-like Behavior 95%
- Testing relationships between multimodal modes of brain structural variation and age, sex and polygenic scores for neuroticism in children and adolescents 93%
- Electrophysiological network alterations in adults with copy number variants associated with high neurodevelopmental risk 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Functional connectivity predicts changes in attention over minutes, days, and months 95%
- Brain preparedness: The cortisol awakening response proacts dynamic organization of large-scale brain networks across emotional and executive functions 94%
- Human adolescent brain similarity development is different for paralimbic versus neocortical zones 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.