Back

Complications and Status Upgrades among Adult Heart Transplant Candidates with Durable LVADs: Waiting 6 to 8 Years for Status Escalation Is Too Long

Ahn, D.; Attia, A.; Nakayama, T.; Narang, N.; Khush, K. K.; Parker, W. F.; Sasaki, K.

2025-09-24 transplantation
10.1101/2025.09.22.25336215 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionAfter the 2018 allocation policy change, the rate of listings and transplants with durable LVADs has decreased significantly in favor of bridging patients from temporary mechanical circulatory support to heart transplant. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) recently approved a policy, to be implemented in September 2026, stipulating that patients supported by durable LVADs for 6 and 8 years will obtain statuses 3 and 2, respectively. MethodsUsing OPTN data, we identified all adult heart transplant candidates with a durable LVAD implanted between October 18, 2018 and May 31, 2025. We estimated the cumulative incidence of status upgrades and durable LVAD-related complications, treating transplantation and waitlist removal before experiencing complications as competing events. We also assessed how the composition of the adult heart transplant waitlist on June 1, 2025 would have changed based on the upcoming policy change. ResultsDuring the study period, 3,881 adult patients were listed for heart transplant with a durable LVAD. 3,182 (82.0%) of the durable LVADs were Abbott HeartMate 3, 568 (14.6%) were Medtronic Heartware HVAD, and 91 (2.3%) were Abbott HeartMate II. Transplant centers submitted a total of 6,924 justifications for status upgrades due to LVAD-related complications (6.3% status 1, 34.3% status 2, and 59.4% status 3) for 1,500 (38.6%) of these patients, with a median of 3 per patient. The cumulative incidence of complications or status upgrades was 38.6% [95% CI (37.1%, 40.2%)]. Nearly all of the 2,381 patients who did not experience any complication or status upgrade during listing were removed from the waitlist by 6 years. Had the upcoming OPTN policy change been implemented on June 1, 2025, the proportion of the waitlist that would have achieved higher priority status instantaneously was 0.06%. ConclusionsThe cumulative incidence of status upgrades and complications among heart transplant candidates with durable LVADs was nearly 40% within 6 years of device implantation. The upcoming OPTN policy to escalate patients to statuses 3 and 2 after 6 and 8 years of durable LVAD support, respectively, is unlikely to make a meaningful impact on waitlist priority status.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Annals of Internal Medicine
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.2%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 14%
14.0%
3
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.1%
4
International Journal of Cardiology
13 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
50% of probability mass above
5
Circulation
66 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.7%
6
Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
52 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
7
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 41%
3.5%
8
BMJ
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.5%
9
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.0%
10
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.0%
11
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
182 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.3%
12
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 8%
2.0%
13
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
14
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
15
Circulation: Heart Failure
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Clinical Investigation
164 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
17
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.5%
18
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
19
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
20
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%
21
Heart Rhythm
22 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.7%
22
American Journal of Transplantation
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%