Family Experiences, Challenges, and Coping Strategies During Women's Perimenopause: A Qualitative Systematic Review Protocol
Shankar, R.; Ali, J. M.; Xu, Q.
Show abstract
BackgroundPerimenopause represents a critical biopsychosocial transition affecting women globally, with profound impacts extending beyond individual experiences to encompass entire family systems. While research has documented various perimenopausal symptoms including vasomotor, psychological, and cognitive changes, limited attention has been given to how families as units experience and navigate this transition. ObjectivesThis systematic review protocol aims to synthesize qualitative evidence on family experiences, challenges, and coping strategies during womens perimenopause, addressing gaps in family-centered perspectives within existing literature. MethodsFollowing PRISMA-P guidelines, we will search eight databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus) from inception to October 2025. The PICo framework guides eligibility criteria focusing on family members of perimenopausal women, their experiences and coping strategies across diverse contexts. Covidence will facilitate study screening and selection. Quality assessment will employ the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist, with risk of bias evaluated using domain-based assessment. Thematic synthesis and meta-ethnographic approaches will analyze extracted data. CERQual will assess confidence in synthesized findings. DiscussionThis protocol anticipates generating comprehensive synthesis revealing family system impacts, typology of challenges, categorization of coping strategies, identification of cultural variations, and documentation of support system gaps. Evidence generated will inform development of family-centered interventions, clinical guidelines, and support systems addressing the multifaceted challenges families face during perimenopausal transitions.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Menopause education of healthcare professionals: A scoping review protocol 97%
- Measurement of changes to the menstrual cycle: A transdisciplinary systematic review evaluating measure quality and utility for clinical trials 94%
- Study Protocol: LIAM Mc Trial (Linking In with Advice and supports for Men impacted by Metastatic cancer) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- Palliative care in the treatment of women with breast cancer: a scoping review protocol 92%
- Taking a participatory research approach within workplace health promotion research to improve physical activity levels in office-based workers: a scoping review protocol 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Women’s knowledge, attitudes and views of preconception health and intervention delivery methods: A cross-sectional survey 93%
- Monitoring One Heart to Help Two: Heart Rate Variability and Resting Heart Rate using Wearable Technology in Active Women Across the Perinatal Period 93%
- A Cross-Sectional Survey Of Australian Women'S Perspectives And Experiences Of Exercise During Pregnancy, Including Women That Experience Mental Illness 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Gynaecological health patterns and motherhood experiences of female professional football players 93%
- Impostor Phenomenon in the Nutrition and Dietetics Profession: An Online Cross-Sectional Survey 92%
- A Cohort Study: Evaluating Self-Efficacy in Adolescents Attending a Tailored Youth-Informed Breastfeeding Program 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A qualitative study investigating the acceptability of cervical screening and self-sampling in postnatal women at 6-week postnatal check-up 92%
- Challenges of visibility and inclusion in Long COVID: a population-based interview study 90%
- Human Papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing among un- and under-screened Māori, Pasifika, and Asian women in Aotearoa New Zealand: a preference survey among responders and interviews with clinical-trial non-responders 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.