Artificial Intelligence in Reminiscence Therapy for Older Adults: A Systematic Review Protocol
Shankar, R.; Ali, J. M.; Xu, Q.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe global aging population faces increasing challenges related to cognitive decline, social isolation, and psychological well-being. Reminiscence therapy has emerged as an effective non-pharmacological intervention, and recent advances in artificial intelligence offer opportunities to enhance these therapeutic approaches. ObjectiveTo systematically review and synthesize evidence on the integration of artificial intelligence technologies in reminiscence therapy for aging populations, examining effectiveness, acceptability, implementation factors, and ethical considerations. MethodsThis protocol follows PRISMA-P guidelines and employs the PICOS framework. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Scopus from inception to October 2025. Studies examining AI-enhanced reminiscence therapy in adults aged 60 years and above will be included. Two independent reviewers will screen studies using Covidence, extract data, and assess quality using appropriate risk of bias tools. Data synthesis will involve meta-analysis where appropriate or narrative synthesis following SWiM guidelines. DiscussionThis protocol establishes a rigorous methodology for examining an emerging field at the intersection of gerontology and artificial intelligence. The systematic approach will provide evidence-based insights for clinical practice, technology development, and policy-making while identifying research gaps and ethical considerations in AI-enhanced therapeutic interventions for older adults.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Technologies for Metabolic Disorders in Older Adults: A Scoping Review Protocol 95%
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 95%
- Protocol for a scoping review of the impact of digital assistive technologies on the quality of life for people with dementia 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Supervised and self-directed technology-based dual-task exercise training programme for older adults at risk of falling – Protocol for a feasibility study 95%
- Cognition, physical function, and life purpose in the rural elderly population: a systematic review protocol 95%
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Helping Older People Engage (HOPE) Study: Protocol & COVID Modifications for a Randomized Trial 95%
- A Retrospective Analysis of Serious Adverse Events and Deaths in US-Based Lifestyle Clinical Trials for Cognitive Health 94%
- Erroneous risks in pharmaceutical versus non-pharmaceutical interventions during data extraction in evidence synthesis practice: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deconditioning in people living with dementia during the COVID-19 pandemic: findings from the Promoting Activity, Independence and Stability in Early Dementia (PrAISED) process evaluation 93%
- “If somebody had told me I’d feel like I do now, I wouldn’t have believed them…” Older adults’ experiences of the BELL trial: a qualitative study 93%
- Patterns of Physical Activity Over Time in Older Patients Rehabilitating after Hip Fracture Surgery: A Preliminary Study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Psychological frailty in older adults: a systematic scoping review 92%
- Use and appropriateness of Reporting Guidelines in physical therapy research: a protocol for a meta-research study 92%
- Large language models for conducting systematic reviews: on the rise, but not yet ready for use – a scoping review 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.