Back

Discovering flexible codes for prediction across timescales in the retina

Bojanek, K.; Lefebvre, B.; Salisbury, J. M.; Marre, O.; Palmer, S.

2026-06-05 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.19.677348 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The retina must encode visual information in a way that supports fast, predictive behavior despite significant processing delays. How this encoding adapts in an ever-changing world, when the temporal statistics of visual input shift, remains an open question. Here we record from populations of retinal ganglion cells in the axolotl as they respond to a stochastic moving bar stimulus across five different temporal correlation scales. Using the information bottleneck (IB) framework, and treating the prediction horizon as a free parameter inferred from the data, we ask what timescale of future motion the retina is optimized to predict under each stimulus condition. We find that the retina adapts its predictive encoding to the changing stimulus statistics: as the time constant of the stimulus dynamics increases, the inferred prediction horizon lengthens. The population shifts toward encoding more velocity information, and motion anticipation grows, all the while maintaining near-optimal prediction efficiency. Population surprise, quantified through a Boltzmann machine model of the retinal response distribution, tracks stimulus surprise under the inferred optimal compression. This connects the retinas reversal response to efficient predictive encoding. These results show that retinal population codes flexibly adjust their predictive timescale to the temporal structure of their inputs. More broadly, they demonstrate that the IB framework can be used to discover, not just test for, computational objectives in sensory populations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS Computational Biology
1863 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
49.0%
2
Neural Computation
39 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.0%
50% of probability mass above
3
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 14%
6.0%
4
Physical Review E
112 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.3%
5
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 14%
3.9%
6
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 39%
2.5%
7
Physical Review Research
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.3%
8
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 44%
2.3%
9
Journal of Computational Neuroscience
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
10
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 51%
1.7%
11
The Journal of Neuroscience
1025 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.7%
12
Physical Review X
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
13
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 31%
1.0%
14
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
235 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
15
Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience
60 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
16
Biophysical Journal
631 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
17
Biological Cybernetics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
18
PRX Life
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
19
Science Advances
1243 papers in training set
Top 34%
0.6%
20
Communications Biology
993 papers in training set
Top 37%
0.6%
21
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%
22
Journal of Neural Engineering
221 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
23
Nature Neuroscience
252 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.6%