NeuroTest: a benchtop testbed for evaluating sensing-capable electrophysiology and neurostimulation systems
Morrow, J. K.; Cho, H.; Benjaber, M.; Denison, T. K.; Widge, A. S.; Herron, J. A.
Show abstract
ObjectiveThe development of increasingly complex implantable neuromodulation devices requires extensive benchtop validation and testing prior to in vivo implementation. Our goal is to enable this in vitro testing by creating a benchtop system that is accessible, easy-to-use, and functions reliably across academic and industry environments, reducing discordant results that arise from discordant approaches. Furthermore, such a system paves the way for standardizing benchtop characterization of future implantable systems by establishing a repeatable and comparable methodology for validating these devices and their capabilities. ApproachWe describe the NeuroTest Board (NTB), a low-cost, open-source device that combines a low-noise current source waveform generator with a high-precision data acquisition system. We provide information on its architecture, operation, and performance as an initial benchmark of the potential capabilities of the system. Main resultsWe demonstrate the use of the NTB to assess electrophysiology systems in two separate applications. In one case, we assess a commonly used laboratory system (the RHD2132 headstage and Open Ephys data acquisition system), while the second case characterizes an investigational neuromodulation device in development for human use (the CorTec Brain InterChange). Following this initial sensing characterization, we explore stimulation-related artifacts that would hamper in vivo data collection. With the NTB, we develop and evaluate artifact mitigation strategies for each system, thus demonstrating an example application of this benchtop testbed. SignificanceThe ability to test neuromodulation devices against a common benchmark will enable faster development of novel therapeutics by increasing inter-institutional reliability and decreasing troubleshooting time.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Multi-modal artificial dura for simultaneous large-scale optical access and large-scaleelectrophysiology in non-human primate cortex 96%
- Wireless networks of injectable microelectronic stimulators based on rectification of volume conducted high frequency currents 96%
- An active electronic, high-density epidural paddle array for chronic spinal cord neuromodulation 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Biophysical modeling of the electric field magnitude and distribution induced by electrical stimulation with intracerebral electrodes 94%
- SimBSI: An open-source Simulink library for developingclosed-loop brain signal interfaces in animals and humans 94%
- Optogenetic Modulation of Cortical Neurons Using Organic Light Emitting Diodes (OLEDs) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Automated artifact injection into sensing-capable brain modulation devices for neural-behavioral synchronization and the influence of device state 97%
- Controlling pallidal oscillations in real-time in Parkinson's disease using evoked interference deep brain stimulation (eiDBS): proof of concept in the human 95%
- Approximating Signal Sources in Stereo-EEG Single Pulse Electrical Stimulation using Re-referencing and Spectral Analysis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Closed-loop control of functional electrical stimulation using a selectively recording and bidirectional nerve cuff interface 95%
- Neural stimulation hardware for the selective intrafascicular modulation of the vagus nerve 95%
- Forecast Padding Enhances Accuracy and Robustness of EEG-Phase-Synchronized TMS 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.