Back

Combining blood transcriptomic signatures improves the prediction of progression to tuberculosis among household contacts in Brazil

Lundell, S.; Kaipilyawar, V.; Johnson, W. E.; Dietze, R.; Ellner, J.; Ribeiro-Rodrigues, R.; Salgame, P.

2025-09-21 infectious diseases Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.09.19.25336212 medRxiv
Show abstract

Tuberculosis remains a major health threat, infecting nearly a third of the worlds population. Of those infected, 5-10% progress from latent infection to active tuberculosis (TB) disease and biomarkers to identify which individuals will progress are needed to allow targeted prophylactic treatment. Several risk biomarkers have been developed to predict progression but have not been tested head-to-head on the same platform. Here, we used the NanoString platform and compared the performance of 15 published gene signatures in predicting progression at baseline in a household contact cohort. Expression of gene signatures was profiled in RNA extracted from whole blood and scored using GSVA and PLAGE. We found that specificity is enhanced by combining signatures and report that the performance of a combined signature that includes a newly derived parsimonious signature through machine learning and a published signature met WHO TPP levels for a triage test. The combined signature had a 90.9% sensitivity and 88% specificity with a PPV of 0.24 and NPV of 1. This combined signature has potential clinical utility in identifying high-risk individuals for targeted prophylaxis to prevent TB morbidity and mortality.

Matching journals

The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Tuberculosis
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.9%
3
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.4%
4
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
109 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.1%
5
Microbial Genomics
225 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
4.8%
6
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 32%
4.4%
7
Microbiology Spectrum
469 papers in training set
Top 4%
3.5%
8
BMC Infectious Diseases
133 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.1%
9
PLOS Pathogens
820 papers in training set
Top 5%
3.1%
50% of probability mass above
10
Journal of Clinical Microbiology
130 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
2.4%
11
European Respiratory Journal
59 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.1%
12
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 47%
1.9%
13
eBioMedicine
183 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
14
Open Forum Infectious Diseases
142 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
15
Communications Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
16
PLOS Global Public Health
344 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.7%
17
Journal of Infection
78 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.7%
18
The Journal of Infectious Diseases
202 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.7%
19
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
466 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
20
International Journal of Epidemiology
88 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.5%
22
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 20%
1.5%
23
International Journal of Infectious Diseases
129 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.3%
24
Clinical Infectious Diseases
235 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
25
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.8%
26
Genomics
64 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
27
mBio
833 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.8%
28
Epidemics
116 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
29
The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.8%
30
The Lancet Microbe
44 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%