Cross-reactive neuraminidase inhibition antibodies against H5N1 by consecutive influenza A imprinting cohorts of the past century: population-based serosurvey, British Columbia, Canada
Skowronski, D. M.; Ranadheera, C.; Kaweski, S. E.; Sabaiduc, S.; Separovic, L.; Mankowski, G.; Ung, J.; Reyes, R. C.; Henry, B.; Albert, A.; Clemens, F.; Kobasa, D.; Bastien, N.
Show abstract
BackgroundAvian influenza of the H5N1 subtype shares substantial relatedness in its neuraminidase (NA) surface protein with human influenza A H1N1 viruses of the past century. Understanding variation in pre-existing anti-N1 antibodies against H5N1 is critical to pandemic risk assessment and preparedness. MethodsWe used anonymized, residual sera collected equally from ten age groups spanning one to >80 years during an August 2024 cross-sectional serosurvey in British Columbia, Canada. We assessed NA inhibition antibody titres by enzyme-linked lectin assay against H5N1 (N=575), H1N1pdm09 (N=250) and H3N2 (N=205). We compared anti-NA titres by birth (imprinting) cohorts defined in relation to historic N1 and/or N2 exposure opportunities. ResultsAmong participants with median age 32 (IQR: 15-62) years, 404 (70%) had cross-reactive anti-N1 titre >10 against H5N1, with 260 (45%), 182 (32%) and 98 (17%), having titres >40, >80 and >160, respectively. H5N1 titres were consistently lower but strongly associated with H1N1pdm09 (r=0.86; 95%CI:0.82-0.89). Geometric mean titres against H1N1pdm09 and H5N1 peaked among young adults born 1997-2003 (427.9, 100.8), declining to lows among young children born 2015-2023 (20.7, 6.8) and middle-aged adults born 1957-1967 (25.1, 10.7), increasing to similar secondary peak among older adults born pre-1947 (387.3, 81.0). ConclusionsA substantial proportion of the population has pre-existing, cross-reactive anti-N1 antibodies against H5N1. We interpret variation by age and imprinting cohorts within a unifying hypothesis, emphasizing the role of historic influenza pandemics in expanding and refining the immune repertoire through heightened attack rates and shifts in immunological hierarchies. Our findings have implications for H5N1 and other zoonotic influenza risk assessment.
Matching journals
The top 9 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The Nicaraguan Pediatric Influenza Cohort Study, 2011-2019: influenza incidence, seasonality, and transmission 95%
- Potential antigenic mismatch of the H3N2 component of the 2019 Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccine 95%
- Variants of concern are overrepresented among post-vaccination breakthrough infections of SARS-CoV-2 in Washington State 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2 evolution and patient immunological history shape the breadth and potency of antibody-mediated immunity 94%
- Asymptomatic and mildly symptomatic influenza virus infections by season -- Case-ascertained household transmission studies, United States, 2017-2023 94%
- Low levels of post-vaccination hemagglutination inhibition antibodies and their correlation with influenza protection among healthcare workers during the 2024/2025 A/H1N1 outbreak in Japan 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Imprinted anti-hemagglutinin and anti-neuraminidase antibody responses after childhood infections of A(H1N1) and A(H1N1)pdm09 influenza viruses 96%
- Population immunity to clade 2.3.4.4b H5N1 is dominated by anti-neuraminidase antibodies 95%
- Low levels of H5N1 HA and NA antibodies in the human population are boosted by seasonal A/H1N1 infection but not by A/H3N2 infection or influenza vaccination 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk assessment of 2024 cattle H5N1 using age-stratified serosurveillance data 95%
- Rapid Surge of Reassortant A(H1N1) Influenza Viruses in Danish Swine and their Zoonotic Potential 94%
- Pigs are highly susceptible to but do not transmit mink-derived highly pathogenic avian influenza virus H5N1 clade 2.3.4.4b 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.