Back

Association of Body Composition With Tumor Proteomics and Survival in Patients With Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Mahenge, C. M.; Akasheh, R. T.; Nguyen, X. V.; Cheng, T.-Y. D.

2025-09-21 epidemiology
10.1101/2025.09.19.25336108 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPrognoses for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are associated with complex interactions between tumor and patient characteristics. This study investigated associations between body composition and tumor proteomics and their interaction with survival among patients with ccRCC. MethodsData from 178 patients in the TCGA-KIRC project were analyzed to assess adipose and skeletal muscle tissue areas at the third lumbar vertebra of diagnostic computed tomography scan images. Patients were classified into four body composition types: high muscle with low adiposity; high muscle with high adiposity; low muscle with low adiposity; and low muscle with high adiposity. Proteins with differential expression were screened for interactions with body composition type on survival. Linear regression was used to assess associations, and Cox regression models--adjusted for age, tumor stage, sex, race, and ethnicity--were utilized for survival analysis. ResultsPatients having low muscle with low adiposity exhibited worse survival than those having high muscle with high adiposity (hazard ratio, 3.74 [95% CI, 1.69-8.27]). Low muscle with low adiposity was also associated with increased expression of P-cadherin and decreased expression of DIRAS3 (P<0.05; false discovery rate-corrected P<0.1), both associated with poor survival in the entire KIRC cohort. Among patients having low muscle with high adiposity, high (vs. low) PREX1 expression was associated with 15.8-fold (95% CI, 3.08-80.78) increased mortality. ConclusionBody composition is associated with differential expression of proteins and survival in ccRCC. Impact: Body composition and tumor proteomics may be prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets in ccRCC.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.