Genomic plasticity drives olfactory adaptation in a pest fly
Xue, Q.; Dweck, H.
Show abstract
Preference shifts in insects are often driven by changes in the olfactory system, yet the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The worldwide pest Drosophila suzukii, which oviposits in ripe rather than overripe fruits, provides a powerful model to study these mechanisms and their behavioral consequences. Here, we show that this shift is linked to functional remodeling in four olfactory receptor neurons: ab2B, ab3A, ab4B, and ab10A. While ab3A and ab10A exhibit tuning changes shared with the non-pest relative D. biarmipes, ab2B and ab4B display species-specific adaptations in D. suzukii. These changes result not only from receptor sequence divergence but also from novel innovations: receptor co-expression in ab3A and partitioned expression of Or67a paralogs in ab2B and ab10A. Together, these findings show how genomic plasticity in chemosensory gene families enables rapid sensory adaptation and niche transition.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Lateral Axonal Modulation is Required for Stimulus-Specific Olfactory Conditioning in Drosophila 96%
- Evolutionary diversification reveals distinct somatic versus germline cytoskeletal functions of the Arp2 branched actin nucleator protein 96%
- Two Parallel Pathways Mediate Olfactory-Driven Backward Locomotion 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular characterization of gustatory second-order neurons reveals integrative mechanisms of gustatory and metabolic information 96%
- Chloride-dependent mechanisms of multimodal sensory discrimination and neuropathic sensitization in Drosophila 96%
- A dopamine-gated learning circuit underpins reproductive state-dependent odor preference in Drosophila females 96%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.