Back

Spectral network analysis illuminates coordinated planttraits across a climate gradient

Ray, R.; Quarles-Chidyagwai, B.; Ashlock, S.; Lyons, J.; Gremer, J. R.; Maloof, J.; Magney, T.

2026-02-21 plant biology
10.1101/2025.09.18.676927 bioRxiv
Show abstract

O_LIUnderstanding how plant populations respond to environmental variation through functional leaf traits remains challenging due to limitations of traditional phenotyping approaches. Hyperspectral reflectance offers a rapid, non-destructive and high-throughput method to capture functional trait variation and detect signatures of local adaptation across populations. C_LIO_LIWe combined hyperspectral data, inverse modeling, and network analysis to investigate population-level variation in Streptanthus tortuosus. Using a common garden experiment with four geographically distinct populations, we applied partial least square discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) and ridge regression for population discrimination, inverse PROSPECT modeling to estimate leaf biochemical traits, and canonical correlation analysis to examine trait-climate relationships across historical (1900-1994) and recent (1995-2024) periods. We developed a spectral network approach treating wavelength correlations as biologically meaningful trait networks. C_LIO_LIPopulations showed distinct, heritable spectral signatures with high classification accuracy. Significant population differences emerged in anthocyanins, carotenoids, chlorophyll, and water content. Trait-climate correlations shifted between time periods, consistent with historical climate adaptation. Network analysis revealed population-specific integration patterns, with more variable environments displaying greater spectral modularity. C_LIO_LIHyperspectral signatures provide a high-throughput tool for detecting population-level adaptation and trait coordination. Our findings provide a framework to investigate how plant populations respond to climate change through evolved shifts in trait networks rather than isolated traits alone. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Plant Journal
197 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.6%
2
New Phytologist
309 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
14.7%
3
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 21%
9.1%
4
Plant Physiology
217 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
6.4%
5
The Plant Cell
141 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
4.8%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Plant Phenome Journal
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
7
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 21%
4.2%
8
Plant Communications
35 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
3.6%
9
Plant Phenomics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
Journal of Experimental Botany
195 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
11
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.9%
12
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
13
Plant Biotechnology Journal
56 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.8%
14
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 54%
1.7%
15
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.3%
16
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.2%
17
Horticulture Research
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
18
Plant, Cell & Environment
78 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Applications in Plant Sciences
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
20
Frontiers in Plant Science
240 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 25%
0.9%
22
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
23
Ecology Letters
121 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
24
in silico Plants
24 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
25
Plant Methods
39 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
26
Communications Biology
886 papers in training set
Top 29%
0.6%