boutliers: R package of outlier detection and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis
Noma, H.; Maruo, K.; Gosho, M.
Show abstract
Meta-analysis is an established methodology for evidence synthesis. In practice, substantial heterogeneity often arises among studies, and random-effects models are widely employed as standard tools. However, in many cases of data synthesis, some studies exhibit markedly different characteristics from others, beyond the degree expected from statistical error, and may become influential outliers that affect the overall conclusions. Although outlier detection and influence diagnostic methods have been discussed in the context of meta-analysis, there has been a lack of user-friendly statistical packages that quantify the statistical uncertainty of diagnostic measures. We developed the R package boutliers, which implements influence diagnostics based on bootstrap methods using simple commands. The package provides three leave-one-out diagnostics: (1) studentized residuals, (2) relative change measures for the variance of the grand mean parameter, and (3) relative change measures for heterogeneity variance. In addition, a model-based approach using a likelihood ratio statistic under a mean-shifted outlier detection model is also available. This article offers a practical tutorial for the boutliers package, illustrated with an application to a meta-analysis of chronic low back pain.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Fast and frugal decision tree for the rapid critical appraisal of systematic reviews 96%
- ZIBGLMM: Zero-Inflated Bivariate Generalized Linear Mixed Model for Meta-Analysis with Double-Zero-Event Studies 95%
- Evaluation of statistical methods used to meta-analyse results from interrupted time series studies: a simulation study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative bias analysis for mismeasured variables in health research: a review of software tools 94%
- Does advance contact with research participants increase response to questionnaires: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis 92%
- Comparison of Bayesian networks, G-estimation and linear models to estimate causal treatment effects in aggregated N-of-1 trials 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The multiverse of data preprocessing and analysis in graph-based fMRI: A systematic literature review of analytical choices fed into a decision support tool for informed analysis 88%
- The central autonomic system revisited - convergent evidence for a regulatory role of the insular and midcingulate cortex from neuroimaging meta-analyses 87%
- Mapping social reward and punishment processing in the human brain: A voxel-based meta-analysis of neuroimaging findings using the Social Incentive Delay task 85%
Similar papers in this journal
- Joint Modeling of Longitudinal Biomarker and Survival Outcomes with the Presence of Competing Risk in Nested Case-Control Studies with Application to the TEDDY Microbiome Dataset 89%
- Robustifying genomic classifiers to batch effects via ensemble learning 89%
- U-PASS: unified power analysis and forensics for qualitative traits in genetic association studies 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Incorporating Preprints in Systematic Reviews: A Preliminary Study of a Novel Method for Rapid Evidence Synthesis 93%
- A Web-based Tool for Automatically linking Clinical Trials to their Publications 91%
- A Novel Question-Answering Framework for Automated Abstract Screening Using Large Language Models 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.