Back

RESTRICT-seq enables time-gated CRISPR screens and uncovers novel epigenetic dependencies of SCC resistance

Amador, D. G.; Powers, J.; Njiru, A.; Ansari, Z.; Woappi, Y.

2026-04-01 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.09.17.676440 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cancer cell evasion of therapy is a highly adaptive process that undermines the efficacy of many treatment strategies. A significant milestone in the study of these mechanisms has been the advent of pooled CRISPR knockout screens, which enable high-throughput, genome-wide interrogations of tumor dependencies and synthetic lethal interactions, advancing our understanding of how cancer cells adapt to and evade therapies. However, the utility of this approach diminishes when applied to dynamic biological contexts, where processes are transient and sensitivity to routine cell culture manipulations that introduce noise and limit meaningful discoveries. To overcome these limitations, we present RESTRICT-seq, a next-generation pooled screening methodology that restricts Cas9 nuclear activation in controlled, repeated cycles. By confining Cas9 catalytic activity to strict temporal windows, RESTRICT-seq mitigates undesired fitness penalties that routinely accumulate throughout pooled screens. When benchmarked against conventional pooled screens and standard inducible protocols, RESTRICT-seq revealed significantly fewer divergent cell clones and increased signal-to-noise ratio, overcoming a key limitation of traditional methods. Leveraging RESTRICT-seq, we conducted a comprehensive functional survey of the druggable mammalian epigenome, uncovering several elusive epigenetic drivers of treatment resistance in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC). This revealed PAK1 as a previously unrecognized mediator of cSCC resistance in human and mouse SCC, offering new insights into a prognostic marker and therapeutic target of high clinical significance. Our findings establish RESTRICT-seq as a powerful tool for extending the applicability of pooled CRISPR screens to dynamic and previously intractable biological contexts.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 20%
9.8%
2
Nature Genetics
240 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.2%
3
Genome Medicine
154 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.1%
4
Molecular Cell
308 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.7%
5
Cancer Discovery
61 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.7%
6
Science
429 papers in training set
Top 7%
4.7%
7
Cell Systems
167 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.2%
8
Nature Biotechnology
147 papers in training set
Top 3%
3.5%
9
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 16%
3.5%
10
Cell Genomics
162 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.5%
50% of probability mass above
11
Nature Cell Biology
99 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
Nature
575 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.3%
13
Nature Methods
336 papers in training set
Top 4%
2.0%
14
Cell Reports Medicine
140 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.0%
15
Molecular Cancer
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
16
Nucleic Acids Research
1128 papers in training set
Top 9%
2.0%
17
Cell
370 papers in training set
Top 10%
1.8%
18
Nature Cancer
35 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.7%
19
Developmental Cell
168 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.6%
20
Cell Reports Methods
141 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.6%
21
Cancer Cell
38 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
22
Science Advances
1098 papers in training set
Top 19%
1.6%
23
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 34%
1.6%
24
Cell Stem Cell
57 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
25
Cancer Research
116 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
26
Science Translational Medicine
111 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
27
EMBO Molecular Medicine
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
28
Genome Biology
555 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
29
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 17%
0.9%
30
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 54%
0.9%