Back

Leveraging transfer learning from Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) pretraining to enhance Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) prediction

Duraiswamy, A.; Harris-Birtill, D.

2025-09-19 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2025.09.17.25336037 medRxiv
Show abstract

We overcome current limitations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) diagnosis by leveraging a transfer learning approach from Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) classification models, thus addressing the urgent need for more accurate and accessible AML diagnostic tools. AML has poorer prognosis than ALL, with a 5-year relative survival rate of only 17-19% compared to ALL survival rates of up to 75%, making early and accurate detection of AML paramount. Current diagnostic methods, rely heavily on manual microscopic examination, and are often subjective, time-consuming, and can suffer from inter-observer variability. While machine learning has shown promise in cancer classification, its application to AML detection, particularly leveraging the potential of transfer learning from related cancers like Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL), remains underexplored. A comprehensive review of state-of-the-art advancements in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) classification using deep learning algorithms is undertaken and key approaches are evaluated. The insights gained from this review inform the development of two novel machine learning pipelines designed to benchmark effectiveness of proposed transfer learning approaches. Five pre-trained models are fine-tuned using ALL training data (a novel approach in this context) to optimize their potential for AML classification. The result was the development of a best-in-class (BIC) model that surpasses current state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance in AML classification, advancing the accuracy of machine learning (ML)-driven cancer diagnostics. Author summaryAcute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Early and accurate diagnosis is critical, but current methods are often subjective and time-consuming. We wanted to create a more accurate diagnostic tool by applying a technique called transfer learning from a similar cancer, Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL). Two machine learning pipelines were developed. The first trained five different models on a large AML dataset to establish a baseline. The second pipeline first trained these models on an ALL dataset to "learn" from it before fine-tuning them on the AML data. Our experiments showed that the models that underwent transfer learning process consistently performed better than the models trained on AML data alone. The MobileNetV2 model, in particular, was the best-in-class, outperforming all other models and surpassing the best-reported metrics for AML classification in current literature. Our research demonstrates that transfer learning can enable highly accurate AML diagnostic models. The best-in-class model could potentially be used as a AML diagnostic tool, helping clinicians make faster and more accurate diagnoses, improving patient outcomes.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.1%
2
Informatics in Medicine Unlocked
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
13.9%
3
Archives of Clinical and Biomedical Research
28 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
4
Computers in Biology and Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
6.1%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 20%
6.1%
50% of probability mass above
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 40%
3.6%
7
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.5%
8
Expert Systems with Applications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
9
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
10
PLOS Digital Health
91 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.0%
11
npj Precision Oncology
48 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
12
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
13
Clinical Cancer Research
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.6%
14
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 16%
1.6%
15
Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer
64 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.6%
16
Diagnostics
48 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
17
Frontiers in Oncology
95 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
18
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.3%
19
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.1%
20
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Immunology
586 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.8%
22
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.7%
23
Oncogenesis
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
24
Transplantation
13 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.7%
25
Cytometry Part A
30 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.7%
26
Medical Image Analysis
33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
27
Modern Pathology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
28
Cancer Research Communications
46 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
29
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 10%
0.7%
30
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
39 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%