Multi-protein panel in pancreatic cyst fluid for improved risk stratification for pancreatic cancer
Manolis, D.; O'Brien, D. P.; Kessler, B. M.; Faulkner, E. C.; Lykoudis, P.; Haque, F.; Khulusi, S.; Razack, A.; Kocher, H. M.; Chang, D. K.; Kramer, H.; Maraveyas, A.; Nikitenko, L. L.
Show abstract
Pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) are the sole radiologically recognisable and highly heterogeneous precursors of pancreatic cancer (PC). The malignant potential of PCLs is inferred from their types, as determined by empirical clinical practice guidelines; however, accurate risk stratification of patients preoperatively presents an unmet clinical need. We performed deep proteomic profiling of pancreatic cyst fluid (PCyF) and identified a first-of-its-kind multi-protein (n=89) panel termed "ASSIGN1" - Early diagnosis and detection of pAncreatic cySt malignancy SIGNature. ASSIGN1 was used for the development and validation of a support vector machine-based model for predicting malignant potential (based on malignancy risk score, zero to one) of individual PCLs using discovery/training and validation/test cohorts. The diagnostic accuracy of the model was evaluated based on histopathology of resected cysts using sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver-operating-characteristic (AUROC) curve measures and compared to Fukuoka guidelines-based preoperative assessment. ASSIGN1-based malignancy risk score was a cyst type-independent and accurate (sensitivity=1.00, specificity=1.00 and AUROC=1.00) predictor of (i) pancreatic carcinoma and (ii) malignant potential of PCLs, which outperformed international consensus Fukuoka guidelines-based preoperative assessment (sensitivity=1.00; specificity=0.38; AUROC=0.71). Our findings demonstrated that ASSIGN1 holds promise to replace current preoperative laboratory tests, complement existing standard-of-care practices and improve preoperative diagnosis of PCLs and early detection of PC.
Matching journals
The top 15 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Redefining phenotypic intratumor heterogeneity of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a bottom-up approach 93%
- A streamlined mass spectrometry-based proteomics workflow forlarge scale FFPE tissue analysis 90%
- IFT-A deficiency in juvenile mice impairs biliary development and exacerbates ADPKD liver disease 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Establishment of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma molecular gradient (PAMG) that predicts the clinical outcome of pancreatic cancer 92%
- Global and single-cell proteomics view of the co-evolution between neural progenitors and breast cancer cells in a co-culture model 91%
- Metabolomic profiling of pancreatic adenocarcinoma reveals fundamental clinical features 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- A prospective validation of nomograms based on BC-116 and BC-106 urine peptide biomarker panels for bladder cancer diagnostics and monitoring 92%
- Molecular pathways in post-colonoscopy versus detected colorectal cancers: results from a nested case-control study 90%
- Frequent post-treatment monitoring of colorectal cancer using individualized ctDNA validated by multi-regional molecular profiling 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Proteogenomic Characterization of Triple-Negative Apocrine Carcinoma Reveals Molecular Features of Progression and Chemotherapy Response 93%
- Prediction of clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula using radiomic features and preoperative data 92%
- Bioinformatic Screen with Clinical Validation for the Identification of Novel Stool Based mRNA Biomarkers for the Detection of Colorectal Lesions Including Advanced Precancerous Lesions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Proteome Profiling of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease 92%
- Host factor PLAC8 is required for pancreas infection by SARS-CoV-2 92%
- Deep plasma proteomics identifies and validates an eight-protein biomarker panel that separate benign from malignant tumors in ovarian cancer 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.