Back

Methods of an Exercise is Medicine-Mediated Behavioral Counseling Intervention in Patients At-Risk for Cardiovascular Disease: The Vitalis Cardio Study

Steinbrink, G. M.; Springer, J. L.; Tetmeyer, L. L.; Mellen, K. R.; Kennelty, K. A.; Reisinger, H. S.; Marcussen, B. L.; Bond, D. S.; Wu, Y.; Carr, L. J.

2025-09-19 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2025.09.17.25335262 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading causes of death in the U.S. Having a healthy dietary pattern and engaging in regular physical activity (PA) reduces the risk of developing CVDs. The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force and the American College of Sports Medicines Exercise is Medicine (EIM) initiatives recommend patients at risk for CVDs receive behavioral counseling interventions (BCIs). However, few patients are screened for lifestyle behaviors and connected with evidence-based BCIs. PurposeTo describe (1) our approaches for identifying insufficiently active patients and connecting them to evidence-based BCIs and (2) the methods of our 12-week, theory-based BCI for insufficiently active patients. MethodsA novel clinical workflow was implemented in six Family Medicine clinics to screen and refer insufficiently active patients to a 12-week BCI. The BCI is theoretically grounded in the Multi-Process Action Control (M-PAC) framework and includes health education, health coaching, and self-monitoring. The implementation and preliminary efficacy of the workflow and BCI will be evaluated with the RE-AIM framework. Implementation outcomes include clinical workflow metrics and BCI acceptability and fidelity. Preliminary efficacy includes changes in psychosocial mechanisms of action, device-based and self-reported health behaviors, and health outcomes. Efficacy outcomes are assessed at baseline, post-intervention, with a subset of outcomes assessed after 12 weeks of post-intervention follow-up. ConclusionThis clinical workflow and BCI will inform the future implementation of primary care-based BCIs to reduce the risk of developing CVD in insufficiently active patients.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
JMIR Research Protocols
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
18.8%
2
DIGITAL HEALTH
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.2%
3
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.5%
4
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 22%
8.5%
5
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 6%
3.6%
6
The American Journal of Cardiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
50% of probability mass above
7
American Journal of Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
8
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
9
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
10
BJGP Open
12 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.8%
11
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.7%
12
Journal of Clinical Medicine
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.7%
13
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
1.7%
14
JMIR Formative Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.5%
15
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
15 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.3%
16
Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
Circulation: Genomic and Precision Medicine
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
Open Heart
19 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
19
Journal of the American Heart Association
119 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
20
Epidemiology
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
21
European Journal of Human Genetics
49 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.2%
22
BMC Health Services Research
42 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
23
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
10 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
24
Heart
10 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.0%
25
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 70%
0.9%
26
Journal of Translational Medicine
46 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
27
PeerJ
261 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
28
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 16%
0.9%
29
BMJ Health & Care Informatics
13 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.8%
30
Cureus
67 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%