Back

Movie-trained transformer reveals novel response properties to dynamic stimuli in mouse visual cortex

Li, B. M.; De Wulf, W.; Katsanevaki, D.; Onken, A.; Rochefort, N. L.

2025-09-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.16.676524 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Understanding how the brain encodes complex, dynamic visual stimuli remains a fundamental challenge in neuroscience. Here, we introduce ViV1T, a transformer-based model trained on natural movies to predict neuronal responses in mouse primary visual cortex (V1). ViV1T outperformed state-of-the-art models in predicting responses to both natural and artificial dynamic stimuli, while requiring fewer parameters and reducing runtime. Despite being trained exclusively on natural movies, ViV1T accurately captured core V1 properties, including orientation and direction selectivity as well as contextual modulation, despite lacking explicit feedback mechanisms. ViV1T also revealed novel functional features. The model predicted a wider range of contextual responses when using natural and model-generated surround stimuli compared to traditional gratings, with novel model-generated dynamic stimuli eliciting maximal V1 responses. ViV1T also predicted that dynamic surrounds elicited stronger contextual modulation than static surrounds. Finally, the model identified a subpopulation of neurons that exhibit contrast-dependent surround modulation, switching their response to surround stimuli from inhibition to excitation when contrast decreases. These predictions were validated through semi-closed-loop in vivo recordings. Overall, ViV1T establishes a powerful, data-driven framework for understanding how brain sensory areas process dynamic visual information across space and time. Code available at github.com/bryanlimy/ViV1T-closed-loop.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.