Back

Social observation influences the trajectory of performance monitoring across trials: evidence from single-trial estimates of the ERN and CRN

Niu, Y.; Hosseini, K.; Pena, A.; Rodriguez, C.; Buzzell, G. A.

2025-09-17 neuroscience
10.1101/2025.09.16.676498 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The error-related negativity (ERN) and correct-related negativity (CRN) are event-related potentials (ERPs) that reflect performance monitoring following error and correct responses, respectively. Prior work demonstrates the ERN is sensitive to the motivational significance of errors, which increases under social observation. However, most studies testing how social observation impacts performance monitoring rely on trial-averaged ERPs, potentially obscuring meaningful fluctuations in ERN/CRN over time. Here, we had participants complete a Flanker task twice (social observation vs. alone) and employed mixed-effects modeling of single-trial ERPs to test if social observation impacts ERN/CRN trajectories over short (within blocks) or long (between blocks) timescales. We found that social observation selectively influenced ERN/CRN trajectories over short timescales: for blocks performed under social observation (but not alone), ERN magnitudes increased across trials and CRN magnitudes decreased. At longer timescales, ERN/CRN significantly decreased across all blocks, regardless of social observation and consistent with a vigilance decrement. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that social observation influences performance monitoring trajectories over short timescales. Results highlight the importance of analyzing ERN/CRN trajectories over relatively short timescales to fully characterize the impact of social observation on performance monitoring dynamics. These findings lay the groundwork for future investigation into whether social observation interacts with individual differences in motivation/affect to differentially impact performance monitoring dynamics.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
119 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
17.1%
2
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 4%
12.4%
3
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
9.8%
4
Psychophysiology
64 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
8.2%
5
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
The Journal of Neuroscience
928 papers in training set
Top 3%
4.1%
7
NeuroImage
813 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.9%
8
Biological Psychology
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.9%
9
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2130 papers in training set
Top 22%
3.2%
10
Cognition
44 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.7%
11
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 55%
1.6%
12
Behavioral Neuroscience
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
13
Neuropsychologia
77 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.4%
14
Neurobiology of Learning and Memory
35 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.2%
15
European Journal of Neuroscience
168 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
16
Experimental Brain Research
46 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 52%
0.9%
18
Journal of Neurophysiology
263 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.9%
19
Human Movement Science
13 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
Imaging Neuroscience
242 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Cortex
102 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
22
Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging
62 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
Psychological Science
14 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
24
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
0.8%
25
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 62%
0.8%
26
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
27
npj Science of Learning
17 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.7%
28
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
29
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 38%
0.6%