Functional characterization of red-shifted rhodopsin channels from giant viruses explored by a machine-learning model for long-wavelength optogenetics
Takaramoto, S.; Zhao, C.; Karasuyama, M.; Schulz, F.; Watanabe, M.; Kawasaki, Y.; Nagata, T.; Konno, M.; Morimoto, N.; Fukuda, M.; Inatsu, Y.; Yawo, H.; Beja, O.; Kato, H. E.; Woyke, T.; Takeuchi, I.; Inoue, K.
Show abstract
Channelrhodopsins (ChRs) are light-gated ion channels. These proteins are widely used in optogenetics to optically manipulate neural activity. However, manipulation using short-wavelength light to activate ChRs causes cell toxicity and is hampered by low tissue penetration. To overcome these difficulties, although several red-shifted ChR variants have been identified, further red-shift is required for more efficient and noninvasive neural control. While molecular screening of ChRs requires high-cost experiments, recent machine-learning-based protein functionality prediction enables more efficient selection of target proteins for characterization. Here, we constructed an elastic-net machine-learning model trained on 1,163 experimental data to predict the maximum absorption wavelength ({lambda}max) of uncharacterized ChRs. The model suggested several red-shifted candidates, and we identified a viral rhodopsin channel, ChR024, with the second-longest{lambda} max as a cation-conducting ChR ({lambda}max = [~]578 nm) after Chrimson ({lambda}max = [~]580 nm). This result demonstrates the high impact of ML on reducing the screening costs of functional proteins.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Photoactivated SOPP3 enables APEX2-mediated proximity labeling with high spatio-temporal resolution in live cells 94%
- Structural mechanism of calcium-mediated hormone recognition and Gβ interaction by the human melanocortin-1 receptor 94%
- Molecular basis of ligand recognition and activation of human V2 vasopressin receptor 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.