Back

Ancestral Origin of the CXCL17-GPR25 System Traced to the Lobe-Finned Fish Latimeria chalumnae

Yu, J.; Wang, J.-J.; Hu, W.-F.; Liu, Y.-L.; Xu, Z.-G.; Guo, Z.-Y.

2025-09-18 biochemistry
10.1101/2025.09.16.676457 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The roles of C-X-C motif chemokine ligand 17 (CXCL17) and its receptor, G protein-coupled receptor 25 (GPR25), in immune regulation are gaining recognition, but their evolutionary origins and phylogenetic distributions have yet to be determined. In this study, we identified a CXCL17 gene in the lobe-finned fish Latimeria chalumnae (coelacanth), a close living relative of tetrapods. This gene produces two alternatively spliced secretory proteins, designated Lc-CXCL17a and Lc-CXCL17b, which display limited sequence similarity to known CXCL17s from mammals or ray-finned fishes. Recombinant forms of Lc-CXCL17a and Lc-CXCL17b were generated via bacterial overexpression, purification, and enzymatic processing. Functional assays, including NanoLuc Binary Technology (NanoBiT)-based {beta}-arrestin recruitment, ligand-receptor binding, and chemotaxis assays, demonstrated that both proteins tightly bound to and potently activated coelacanth GPR25 in a manner dependent on their C-terminal residues, because removal of these residues markedly diminished activities. These findings provide the first evidence that a functional CXCL17-GPR25 system exists in lobe-finned fishes, supporting the hypothesis that this ligand-receptor pair originated in ancient fishes and was transmitted to vertebrate lineages through lobe-finned fish ancestors. This work broadens understanding of chemokine evolution and highlights the coelacanth as a valuable model for tracing conserved immune signaling pathways.

Published in Biochimie (predicted rank #4) · training set

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.