Top ten research priorities for Essential Emergency Critical Care: A modified Delphi process
Ellis, R. R.; Ayuningtyas, W.; Wharton Smith, A.; Gerdin Warnberg, M.; Otto Schell, C.; The EECC Prioritisation Group, ; Baker, T.
Show abstract
Critical illness leads to millions of preventable deaths each year. Essential Emergency and Critical Care (EECC) is a pragmatic, globally relevant approach designed to address critical gaps in basic life-saving care. This study identified the top ten research priorities to guide the development of EECC over the next five years. At the first global EECC Research Conference in November 2024, 46 clinicians, researchers, and policy makers participated in a structured priority-setting process. Participants formed four thematic groups focused on the current state, implementation, impact, and refinement of EECC. Throughout five sessions, groups developed sub-themes, generated research questions, and identified key priorities. An anonymous survey was used to rank questions within each theme, followed by a final selection of the top ten. Participants developed 28 research questions across four themes. The final top ten included four on EECC implementation, four on its current state, and two on impact. No top-ranked questions emerged from the refinement theme. The top ten EECC research priorities focused on estimating the burden of critical illness and on implementing programs effectively. Advancing these priorities through collaborative research is essential to strengthen health systems and improve outcomes for critically ill patients globally.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Health System Resilience-enhancing Strategies for Managing Public Health Emergencies of International Concerns (PHEIC): Success and Challenges A Systematic Review Protocol 95%
- The preparedness and response to COVID-19 in a quaternary Intensive Care Unit in Australia: perspectives and insights from frontline critical care clinicians 95%
- Mortality Outcomes in Task-Sharing for Emergency Care: Impact of Emergency Physician Supervision on Non-Physician Emergency Care in Rural Uganda 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Getting to the Emergency Department in Time: Interviews With Patients and Their Caregivers on the Challenges to Emergency Care Utilization in Rural Uganda - a Grounded Theory Approach 95%
- Strengthening health service delivery and governance through institutionalizing ‘Urban Health Atlas’ - a geo-referenced Information Communication and Technology tool: lessons learned from an implementation research in three cities in Bangladesh 95%
- Protocol For The Development Of A Core Outcome Set For Respectful Maternal And Newborn Care In A Low-Middle Income Setting 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- ePOCT+ and the medAL-suite: Development of an electronic clinical decision support algorithm and digital platform for pediatric outpatients in low- and middle-income countries 95%
- Impact of electronic medical records on healthcare delivery in Nigeria: A Review 95%
- The NASSS (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread and Sustainability) framework use over time: A scoping review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rising Through the Pandemic: A scoping review of quality improvement in public health during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Understanding Knowledge, Attitudes and Practices on Ebola Virus Disease: A Multi-Site Mixed Methods Survey on Preparedness in Rwanda 92%
- Mpox knowledge and perception in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Influences on policy-formulation, decision-making, organisation and management for maternal, newborn and child health in Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Malawi and Uganda: the roles and legitimacy of a multi-country network 95%
- Mentorship in Health Research Institutions in Africa: A Systematic Review of Approaches, Benefits, Successes, Gaps and Challenges 95%
- Task shifting healthcare services in the post-COVID world: A scoping review 95%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.